Eileen Heumann
Ana Valentina Palacio Siebe1
Christiane Stock
Katherina Heinrichs- 1Institute of Health and Nursing Science, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- 2Unit for Health Promotion Research, University of Southern Denmark, Esbjerg, Denmark
Objectives: Higher education students in Germany are vulnerable to depressive symptoms. Despite ample evidence, no comprehensive review has recently been conducted. Thus, our systematic review and meta-analysis aims at describing the extent to which students are affected by depressive symptoms.
Methods: We searched three databases for articles reporting the prevalence rates of depressiveness among students in Germany published between 2002 and 2023. Pooled prevalence rates were calculated using random effects models, both for the overall sample and for subgroups categorized by gender, study setting, assessment instrument, and whether the study was conducted before or during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Results: The search yielded 992 records. After screening, 60 articles remained for data extraction. About one out of five students (21.1%) exhibits depressive symptoms. Pooled prevalence rates differ between subgroups, with higher rates during the COVID-19 pandemic than before (30.6% versus 18.0%) and with females being more affected than their male counterparts (29.0% versus 23.1%).
Conclusion: This review underlines the urgency with which the mental health of students should be addressed at the (higher educational) policy level.
Clinical Trial Registration: PROPSPERO, Identifier CRD42022384066.
Introduction
When entering higher education, students are exposed to a number of new and stressful experiences that might affect their mental health [1, 2]. The pressure for academic success, competitive environments within study programs, concerns about post-graduation prospects as well as moving away from home, taking on financial responsibilities for the first time and finding an accommodation are likely to contribute to higher education students’ severe stress, anxiety, and depressive symptoms [2, 3].
Previous international systematic reviews show that prevalence rates of depressive symptoms in higher education students and certain subgroups are generally high [4–6]. According to these findings, more than one-quarter of higher education students suffer from depressive symptoms [4]. In Germany, cross-sectional studies reveal similarly high levels of depressive symptoms [7–9], and compared to the general population, higher education students are more likely to develop depressive symptoms [10].
Some groups of higher education students show higher rates of depressive symptoms [5]. For example, female students [11] and individuals with low socio-economic status [6] are considered to be more at high risk of developing depressive disorders. Similarly, sexual and gender minorities commonly exhibit more depressive symptoms [12]. Furthermore, students who possess limited social support resources [13], face interpersonal stressors (e.g., in romantic and peer relationships) [11], have pre-existing health conditions, or have experienced traumatic events or childhood adversities [5] seem to have a higher prevalence of depressive symptoms.
Evidence suggests that psychological problems in higher education students are associated with comprised academic performance and diminished productivity [14, 15] as well as an elevated risk of discontinuing studies [16]. Apart from this, depressive symptoms in higher education students are associated with risk behaviors like illicit substance use or frequent binge drinking [17, 18] as well as with lower levels of physical activity [19]. Moreover, higher education students who report depressive symptoms are more prone to self-injurious behavior and suicide ideation [20]. In conclusion, the proliferation of depressive symptoms has various negative and detrimental consequences for the affected students, the universities, and the society at large [16, 21].
Research suggests that the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic exacerbated the mental burden experienced by higher education students: several cross-sectional studies conducted during this period reported elevated levels of depressive symptoms among students compared to pre-pandemic times in the general population [22, 23]. Additionally, longitudinal studies [24] and cross-sectional comparisons [25] provide further evidence of the escalating levels of depressive symptoms over the course of the pandemic. The unprecedented circumstances, such as sudden shifts to online learning, reduced social interactions, financial constraints, and uncertainty about the future, have all contributed to the worsening mental health outcomes among higher education students during this challenging time period [24, 26].
Over the last decade to 15 years, there has been a growing emphasis on public mental health research among higher education students, particularly focusing on monitoring the prevalence of depressive symptoms and assessing the associated factors [4, 27, 28]. Notably, during the COVID-19 pandemic, there has been an upsurge in the number of studies conducted, especially cross-sectional studies, aimed at expanding the existing body of evidence [25, 29].
Nevertheless, no comprehensive review compiling the results of the various studies on the prevalence of depressive symptoms among higher education students in Germany is known to us. Thus, an overview on the results of previous studies is needed. The results of such a review can be used to develop certain programs in the university context to promote higher education students’ mental health. Ultimately, this research can contribute to enhancing the support systems and services available to students, aiding in the early identification and management of mental health issues, and fostering a conducive learning environment for the academic success and holistic development of higher education students.
Hence, the objective of this systematic review is to determine the extent to which higher education students are affected by depressive symptoms in Germany by addressing the following research question: What is the prevalence of depressive symptoms among higher education students in Germany? Furthermore, our objective is to ascertain the prevalence of depressive symptoms in specific subgroups (e.g., female and male students) based upon available data.
Methods
Literature Search Strategy and Data Sources
Our systematic review was a priori registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022384066). During the whole research process, we considered the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) [30].
The systematic literature search included three core concepts, namely, “depressive symptoms,” “higher education students,” and “Germany.” Within each concept, we used different free text terms with truncations and controlled vocabulary terms with automatic explosion, which were joined with ‘OR’. The concepts were linked using ‘AND’. Both German and English search terms were included (Table 1). We restricted our search to “Title and Abstract” in order to be more precise and to avoid obtaining results where a higher education institution is indicated in the authors’ affiliations. Moreover, filters on English or German language, peer reviewed journal, and publication date within the years 2002–2023 were applied as we decided to focus on the period after the implementation of the Bologna reform in Germany to make the results more comparable.
Table 1. Components of the search string (Depressive symptoms among higher education students in Germany–a systematic review and meta-analysis, Berlin, Germany, 2022–2023).
We searched the databases MEDLINE and Embase through Ovid and PsycINFO through EbscoHOST, respectively for eligible publications on July 15, 2022. We set an alert, which continued until data extraction was completed on June 30, 2023. Additional searches were conducted by one author (EH) via Elicit [31] on July 26, 2023 and by reviewing the references of the identified articles and the citing literature via Google Scholar. The search in Elicit was based on the underlying research question of the review.
Study Eligibility Criteria
We included articles which met the following criteria: 1) the population studied are students from universities or universities of applied sciences, 2) data was assessed at higher education institutions in Germany, and 3) information on depressive symptoms as outcome is provided, including diagnosis of affective disorders (International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD) codes F30-F39) or prevalence rates indicated by cut-off values of instruments for assessing depressive symptoms. In addition, we considered only 4) original articles published in peer-reviewed journals in 5) German or English language 6) between 2002 and 2023. Our inclusion criteria were modified during the screening process because the data appeared too comprehensive. Therefore, we decided to include only prevalence rates and not to include studies that reported mean values.
Qualitative studies, opinion papers and commentaries, review articles, and studies published only as abstracts were excluded. In addition, studies that examined depressiveness as symptoms of other conditions than affective disorders (e.g., postnatal depression) or in other population groups (e.g., high-school students) were also excluded.
Study Selection and Data Extraction
Rayyan [32], an online tool for conducting collaborative reviews, was used to maintain the search results. Duplicates were automatically removed by the search portals and can therefore not be reported. Two reviewers (EH and KH) independently screened all results of the literature search and excluded irrelevant articles based on titles and abstracts. Cohen’s kappa was calculated for this selection step to account for interrater agreement. Full text copies were obtained and independently assessed by two reviewers (EH and KH). Publications were excluded only if the two reviewers agreed, and any disagreements were resolved by discussion until consensus was reached. Reasons for exclusion were documented during full-text screening.
One reviewer (EH) extracted data from all included publications using a standardized excel spreadsheet. The following information was extracted and synthesized: bibliographical data (first author’s name, year of publication), study design, period of data assessment, details on study population (sample size, higher education institution, age and gender distribution, study field(s)), instruments used to assess depressive symptoms, prevalence of depressive symptoms in the whole sample and additional prevalence rates (e.g., for subgroups)—if applicable.
Quality Appraisal
The appraisal of study quality was conducted by two authors, EH and KH, ensuring a thorough and objective assessment process during which each person checked the other person’s appraisal. By employing the Joanne Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Tool for Studies Reporting Prevalence Data [33], we ensured a rigorous and standardized assessment of the quality of prevalence studies included in our review. This tool allowed us to systematically assess various aspects of the studies, enhancing the credibility and reliability of our findings. The JBI Critical Appraisal Tool is commonly utilized for evaluating the quality of prevalence studies [34, 35], and its use has been recently recommended following a systematic review of quality assessment tools [36]. This checklist comprises 9 items, which assess various aspects of the study, including the representativeness of the sample, appropriateness of recruitment methods, adequacy of sample size, detailed description of subjects and setting, valid ascertainment and measurement of the condition, thorough reporting of statistical analysis, use of standard measurements for all participants, and adequacy of the response rate. Although the tool does not provide a numerical score, we assigned proportions to rate the quality of the included articles. However, poor-quality articles with a high risk of bias were not excluded from data synthesis as this could lead to selection bias [37] and their contributions will be thoroughly discussed within the context of the overall discussion.
Data Synthesis and Statistical Analysis
For descriptive data synthesis, a comprehensive table was generated, presenting the sociodemographic characteristics of each study along with their respective prevalence rates of depressive symptoms among higher education students. This tabular format provides an overview over the individual study findings and their respective sample compositions.
Additionally, meta-analyses were undertaken using SPSS Version 29.0 to synthesize the data. Given the variability in prevalence and variance within studies and as recommended by Borges Migliavaca et al. [38], a random effects model was employed. The range of effects was evaluated through visual examination of the forest plot depicting estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), along with consideration of the weight assigned to each point estimate. For studies in which more than one subgroup prevalence rate was reported for the entire sample, a weighted mean was calculated to avoid distorting the p-value of the meta-analysis by including multiple data points per study.
Subgroup analyses were carried out to explore heterogeneity among studies. The subgroups were defined based on sex (male/female), field of study (medicine and dentistry), first-year students only, and time-point of data collection (before/during the COVID-19 pandemic). Subgroup analyses were also conducted for the two most frequently used screening tools, the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ) and the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). Differences between subgroups were assessed based on 95% CIs. Moreover, the I2 statistic was utilized to assess the extent of study heterogeneity. Values above 25%, 50%, and 75% were considered to represent low, moderate, and high levels of heterogeneity, respectively [39]. A funnel plot was additionally created to visualize the potential heterogeneity and publication bias.
In case of sample overlap across multiple articles, for example, by utilizing the same dataset, only the one with the largest sample size was incorporated into the meta-analysis. This was done to mitigate potential bias. If studies used multiple assessment instruments, we included results from the instrument validated and established in student mental health research and if more than one prevalence rate was reported (e.g., for sex-specific subgroups only), we calculated a weighted mean for consideration in the meta-analysis.
In case of longitudinal studies with multiple time points, our meta-analysis focused on using the baseline prevalence data, as it was done in previous student mental health research, e.g., by Ahmed et al. [40]. This decision was primarily based on two considerations. Firstly, the baseline data frequently represents the largest sample size among all data collection time points, ensuring a more robust estimate of prevalence. Secondly, using baseline data helps to minimize potential confounding factors, such as demand characteristics or selection bias, which might arise at subsequent data collection time-points due to biased study participation and external factors occurring over time [40]. In addition, the inclusion of data from interventional studies for mental health would also result in selection bias.
Results
Literature Search
Figure 1 shows the literature selection process. The initial search resulted in 911 records, and the ongoing alert yielded a further 81 records. We retrieved another 16 records through cross-checking the references and citing literature as well as through an additional search via Elicit (5 articles). After removing duplicates, 622 articles remained for title and abstract screening, of which 38 were inconsistently judged by the two reviewers (EH and KH). The resulting Cohen’s kappa was κ = 0.9, indicating a level of almost perfect agreement (93.9%). Of the 622 articles, 404 were excluded because they did not meet the eligibility criteria, leaving 218 articles for full text analysis. After full text screening, 60 articles remained for data extraction, and 56 could be used for meta-analysis. A total of four articles were excluded from the overall meta-analysis due to sample overlap as mentioned above. These articles comprised Berger et al. [41], Burger et al. [42], Mikolajczyk et al. [43], and Weber et al. [7].
Figure 1. PRISMA flow diagram [44] for literature search on depressive symptoms among higher education students in Germany (Depressive symptoms among higher education students in Germany—a systematic review and meta-analysis, Berlin, Germany, 2022–2023).
Characteristics of the Included Studies
Table 2 provides a comprehensive overview of the study characteristics found within the included articles. Most studies employed a cross-sectional design (n = 51). The sample sizes varied, ranging from n = 50 [45] to n = 7,203 participants [46], with a total of 75,107 participants and a mean sample size of 1,252 persons per study. The articles were published between 2008 and 2023, and data were gathered from 2004 to 2022.
Table 2. Characteristics of included studies (Depressive symptoms among higher education students in Germany–a systematic review and meta-analysis, Berlin, Germany, 2022–2023).
Among the studies, 29 focused on medical and/or dental students, while 15 publications reported data on sex-specific prevalence rates. Notably, 15 studies were conducted during the pandemic, and 13 studies specifically provided information regarding first-year students. A diverse range of 14 different assessment instruments were utilized to measure depressive symptoms. Most of the studies employed versions of the PHQ (PHQ-2/PHQ-8/PHQ-9) in 30 instances, followed by the BDI (BDI-I/BDI-II/M-BDI) in 16 cases and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale - Depression subscale (HADS-D) in 4 instances. Different cut-off levels were applied across these assessment instruments. Studies utilizing the PHQ primarily reported at least moderate levels of depressive symptoms, while those employing the BDI mostly indicated at least mild depressive symptoms.
The prevalence rates of depressive symptoms exhibited considerable variability across the studies. In general, the rates ranged from 2.2% (weighted mean prevalence rate for the overall sample [47]) to 59.1% [22]. For female students, the rates ranged from 5.9% [28] to 59.8% [23], while for male students, the rates ranged from 6.2% [28] to 49.2% [23].
Quality Assessment
All 60 articles were assessed based on the nine items of JBI Critical Appraisal Tool for Studies Reporting Prevalence Data [34]. The score of each included publication can be found in Table 2. The assessment of these publications resulted in cumulative scores that ranged from 3 to 9, with a mean score of 6.3, out of a possible 9 points. The majority of studies employed suitable sampling methods (e.g., data assessment in compulsory lectures) (65.0%), provided sufficient details regarding the characteristics of their study subjects and settings (e.g., information on age and sex of the participants) (66.7%), and maintained adequate sample sizes that ranged from 306 [9] to 7,203 participants [46] (68.3%). Of 60 studies, 96.7% used an appropriate sample frame to address the target population, which substantially mitigates the risk of overgeneralizing the findings: a minimum sample size of 305 was determined based on the calculation for prevalence studies [94, 95]. This calculation considered an assumed prevalence rate of 20%, drawing upon findings from prior systematic reviews on depressive symptoms in comparable population groups [4–6].
The risk of bias for outcome measurement was consistently low due to the overall use of assessment instruments with clearly defined cut-offs for depressive symptoms (98.3%). A total of 68.3% of the studies utilized a consistent measurement approach for all participants. However, we were unable to confirm this for 19 studies due to missing information, such as whether assessments were conducted with pen and paper and whether a trained instructor was present.
Nearly half of the studies (n = 27) reported the prevalence rate in terms of percentages without specifying proportions, necessitating the classification of such studies as “unclear” in this regard. The response rate for 25 studies was noted to be below 10% or not appropriately managed, or in some instances, simply not reported.
Meta-Analyses
In our analysis, we found a pooled prevalence rate of 21.1% (95% CI: 17.6%–24.6%) for depressive symptoms among the higher education student population (Figure 2). The funnel plot showed no publication bias but reflected the large heterogeneity of results (Figure 3), and so did the I2 statistic (99%). When analyzing studies using the same assessment tool only, the pooled prevalence rates for moderate depressive symptoms based on the PHQ scale and at least mild depressive symptoms using the BDI scale were 24.8% (95% CI: 19.5%–30.1%) and 22.4% (95% CI: 17.4%–27.3%), respectively.
Figure 2. Meta-analysis of 56 studies on prevalence of depressive symptoms among higher education students in Germany (Depressive symptoms among higher education students in Germany–a systematic review and meta-analysis, Berlin, Germany, 2022–2023) * LogOR = log-transformed odds ratio.
Figure 3. Funnel plot for publication bias (Depressive symptoms among higher education students in Germany–a systematic review and meta-analysis, Berlin, Germany, 2022–2023).
When examining subgroups (Supplementary File S1), we observed that the pooled prevalence rate for female students was 29.0% (95% CI: 21.4%–36.5%), while it was lower for male students at 23.1% (95% CI: 16.5%–29.6%). Furthermore, when considering the subgroups of higher education students, medicine or dental health education students exhibited a pooled prevalence rate of 13.2% (95% CI: 9.9%–16.4%). Among first-year students, the pooled prevalence rate was 11.0% (95% CI: 7.7%–14.3%), indicating a relatively lower prevalence in this subgroup. Our analysis revealed variations in the prevalence of depressive symptoms before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Prior to the pandemic, the pooled prevalence rate was 18.0% (95% CI: 14.7%–21.2%), but during the pandemic, it was considerably higher than before (30.6%, 95% CI: 22.1%–39.1%).
Stratified by time-point of survey (Supplementary File S2, S3), around one-quarter of female higher education students and a fifth of their male counterparts showed depressive symptoms before the pandemic (25.7%, 95% CI: 18.8%–32.5% and 20.1%, 95% CI: 14.2%–26.1%, respectively). When measured with different versions of the PHQ, the pooled prevalence rate before the pandemic was 18.6% (95% CI: 13.5%–23.8%) and during the pandemic it was 33.7% (95% CI: 25.1%–42.2%). For the subgroup of medical and dental students, the time-point of the survey made no difference regarding the extent of depressive symptoms before the pandemic: 13.2%, 95% CI: 9.4%–17.0%, during the pandemic: 13.3% (95% CI: 7.6%–19.0%). During the pandemic, the BDI was not employed for data collection, only two studies examined sex-specific prevalence rates [43, 103], and only one specifically focused on first-year students [79], thus no stratification was conducted.
Discussion
One out of five higher education students is affected by depressive symptoms. Pooled prevalence rates vary across different subgroups, and prevalence rates were higher during the COVID-19 pandemic compared to the times before the outbreak.
Our findings underpin the high level of affection among higher education students aligning with the outcomes of the World Health Organization World Mental Health Survey conducted by Auerbach et al. [96]. In their study, they reported that 20.3% of students across 21 countries acknowledged the presence of a mental health disorder, encompassing conditions such as anxiety, depressive mood disorders, behavioral issues, and substance use disorders. Notably, the high prevalence rate also appears to surpass that of the general population in Germany. According to the German Health Update/European Health Interview Survey (GEDA 2014/2015-EHIS) [97], approximately one in ten individuals in the general German population experienced depressive symptoms, with higher levels observed among women compared to men [10].
Sex differences can also be confirmed in the higher education student population: Luo et al. [98] reported significantly higher prevalence rates of depressive symptoms among female students compared with males (30.8% vs. 28.6%, p < 0.001) in their systematic review and meta-analysis conducted during the pandemic in China. Further evidence emphasizes the potential sex disparities in depressive symptoms [11, 99, 100]. While our analysis did not establish statistically significant sex differences, it did uncover a notable distinction between women and men, with rates of 29.0% and 23.1%, respectively.
Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, higher education students exhibited a notably elevated overall prevalence rate of depressive symptoms [98, 101, 102]. Deng et al. [101] conducted a global systematic review and meta-analysis, revealing a pooled prevalence of depressive symptoms at 34%. Our findings parallel this trend, with a pooled prevalence rate of 30.6% during the pandemic. Volken et al. [100] also identified a gender-adjusted effect, reporting that the prevalence of depressive symptoms was higher in both Swiss female students (30.8%) and male students (24.8%) compared to the pre-pandemic Swiss population. These findings underscore the necessity for psychological support during periods of crisis. Given the ongoing political conflicts and wars, as well as the looming climate crisis, the potential for sustained mental distress cannot be disregarded [103].
Regarding subgroups of students, the prevalence rate for first-year students appears to be lower than the prevalence measured in all students. This observation is consistent with findings by Luo et al. [98], who found higher prevalence rates in postgraduates compared to undergraduates, indicating a greater susceptibility in later phases of education. In Germany, there are only few longitudinal studies focusing on the mental wellbeing of students during their academic journey. These studies suggest a deterioration in mental health among higher education students over the course of their studies [78, 104]. However, the findings are mixed, as some cross-sectional studies indicate the opposite–a high burden at the start or an improvement in mental wellbeing by the end of the study; this is observed both in Germany [80] and internationally [105]. Additional longitudinal studies featuring representative samples are needed to establish a comprehensive perspective on students’ mental health and to identify areas requiring targeted interventions. This approach could also identify possible reasons as to why the health of higher education students varies in different phases of their studies, e.g., a selective drop-out of students with poor mental health.
Half of the studies included students from medical disciplines. This tendency may arise from convenience and proximity, as many of the studies were conducted by researchers in medical or health-related fields. In their subgroup meta-analysis, a lower prevalence of depressive symptoms (13.2%) was observed compared to the overall prevalence rate. Compared with international findings German medical students seem to be less affected: Tam et al. [106] reported an overall pooled prevalence rate of 27.0% in their overview of systematic reviews on prevalence of depressive symptoms among medical students. Despite the strong focus on research within the medical field, only a limited number of studies have reported subgroup data based on the field of study. Future research should broaden its scope to include students from various faculties and subjects, as initial findings suggest the presence of vulnerable groups among non-medical students, such as those studying technology subjects [22, 27].
Strengths and Limitations
This systematic review and meta-analysis provide a valuable estimation of the prevalence of depressive symptoms among higher education students in Germany. The study exhibits several strengths, including the comprehensive approach of searching three databases, the use of alerts for relevant publications until data extraction was completed, and a well-structured and exhaustive search strategy. Furthermore, the study’s adherence to PRISMA guidelines for systematic reviews, coupled with the quality appraisal conducted by two researchers, significantly bolsters the robustness of its findings.
However, it is essential to acknowledge the inherent limitations associated with this research. Utilizing self-report instruments is a valid method for assessing depressive symptoms. These instruments, despite targeting the same latent variable, exhibit variations in their conceptualization, including the application of distinct cut-off levels. This discrepancy served as the rationale for our subgroup analysis on the two out of 14 most frequently employed instruments. Interestingly, we found similar prevalence rates for the PHQ and BDI, even though one assesses moderate and the other mild depressive symptoms. However, our study has notable limitations due to strong over-representation of research with focus on students from medical subjects, the heterogeneity observed among the results, and the variability in measurement tools among the included studies. While subgroup analyses were conducted to explore potential sources of heterogeneity, a more in-depth assessment through meta-regression was not performed, leaving the underlying causes of this heterogeneity not fully elucidated. Accordingly, it is not possible, for example, to determine why there were differences in prevalence rates before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. In addition, these differences need to be interpreted with caution, because they were based on different studies with different sample characteristics and procedures.
Regarding the quality assessment of the articles, we employed a standardized tool to reduce potential biases. Most of the studies featured adequate sample sizes, sampling methods, and measurement of assessing depressive symptoms. Studies with a poor quality (<5 out of 9 possible points) accounted for a relatively small proportion (4,495/75,107 participants = 5.98%) of the overall sample, so that an overall low risk of bias can be assumed. However, there was variability in the quality of reporting in prevalence studies. In this regard, we can fully support the recommendation for the incorporation of checklists like STROBE [107] to ensure comprehensive and consistent reporting practices also in the context of future epidemiological research in Germany.
Conclusion
In conclusion, this systematic review with meta-analysis sheds light on the significant burden of depressive symptoms among higher education students in Germany. Our findings indicate that up to 30% (in certain subgroups) are affected by depressive symptoms, a prevalence higher than in the general population calls for urgent attention and intervention. Importantly, our analysis reveals variations in pooled prevalence rates across different subgroups, highlighting the need for targeted mental health support tailored to specific student demographics such as female sex. Ongoing monitoring and support should be provided to ensure the wellbeing and academic success of higher education students. Universities should consider revising study conditions and implementing support programs that address the mental health needs of their student populations. This may include providing accessible counselling services and fostering a supportive learning environment.
Furthermore, the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental wellbeing of higher education students cannot be underestimated. Our study underscores that depressive symptom prevalence rates were notably higher during the pandemic compared with pre-pandemic times. This reflects the unique challenges and stressors faced by students during this unprecedented period. Against the background of persistent crises, it is essential to delve deeper into the specific factors contributing to the increased prevalence of depressive symptoms among higher education students. Longitudinal studies that track students’ mental health over an extended period can provide valuable insights into the lasting effects of the pandemic on their wellbeing.
Author Contributions
EH and KH were substantially involved in the conception of the work. EH, KH and AP collected and extracted the data. EH, KH and CS analyzed and interpreted the data. EH drafted the manuscript, and all authors reviewed it and contributed their revisions. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Funding
The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. We acknowledge financial support from the Open Access Publication Fund of Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they do not have any conflicts of interest.
Acknowledgments
We deeply appreciate the efforts of our student assistants, Valeria Schellenberg and Maria Müller for their dedicated contributions to this research endeavor. We would also like to express our gratitude to Daniel Schulze from the Institute of Biometry and Clinical Epidemiology at Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin for his invaluable support and expert guidance in conducting statistical analyses for our article.
Supplementary Material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.ssph-journal.org/articles/10.3389/phrs.2024.1606983/full#supplementary-material
References
1. Arnett, JJ. Emerging Adulthood: The Winding Road from the Late Teens Through the Twenties. 1st ed. New York: Oxford University Press (2014).
2. Brown, P. The Invisible Problem? Improving Students’ Mental Health. HEPI Report 88. Oxford: Higher Education Policy Institute (2016).
3. Beiter, R, Nash, R, McCrady, M, Rhoades, D, Linscomb, M, Clarahan, M, et al. The Prevalence and Correlates of Depression, Anxiety, and Stress in a Sample of College Students. J Affective Disord (2015) 173:90–6. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2014.10.054
4. Rotenstein, LS, Ramos, MA, Torre, M, Segal, JB, Peluso, MJ, Guille, C, et al. Prevalence of Depression, Depressive Symptoms, and Suicidal Ideation Among Medical Students: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. JAMA (2016) 316(21):2214–36. doi:10.1001/jama.2016.17324
5. Sheldon, E, Simmonds-Buckley, M, Bone, C, Mascarenhas, T, Chan, N, Wincott, M, et al. Prevalence and Risk Factors for Mental Health Problems in University Undergraduate Students: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis. J Affective Disord (2021) 287:282–92. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2021.03.054
6. Ibrahim, AK, Kelly, SJ, Adams, CE, and Glazebrook, C. A Systematic Review of Studies of Depression Prevalence in University Students. J Psychiatr Res (2013) 47(3):391–400. doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2012.11.015
7. Weber, R, Ehrenthal, JC, Pförtner, TK, Albus, C, and Stosch, C. Die schönste Zeit des Lebens? Psychische Belastungen von Studierenden am Beispiel einer deutschen Hochschule. Z für Klinische Psychol Psychotherapie (2020) 49(1):43–51. doi:10.1026/1616-3443/a000573
8. Rabkow, N, Pukas, L, Sapalidis, A, Ehring, E, Keuch, L, Rehnisch, C, et al. Facing the Truth - A Report on the Mental Health Situation of German Law Students. Int J L Psychiatry (2020) 71:101599. doi:10.1016/j.ijlp.2020.101599
9. Müller, C, El-Ansari, K, and El Ansari, W. Cross-Sectional Analysis of Mental Health Among university Students: Do Sex and Academic Level Matter? Int J Environ Res Public Health (2022) 19(19):12670. doi:10.3390/ijerph191912670
10. Bretschneider, J, Kuhnert, R, and Hapke, U. Depressive Symptomatik bei Erwachsenen in Deutschland [Depressive Symptoms Among Adults in Germany]. J Health Monit (2017) 2(3):81–8. doi:10.17886/rki-gbe-2017-058
11. Hunt, J, and Eisenberg, D. Mental Health Problems and Help-Seeking Behavior Among College Students. J Adolesc Health (2010) 46(1):3–10. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2009.08.008
12. Borgogna, NC, McDermott, RC, Aita, SL, and Kridel, MM. Anxiety and Depression Across Gender and Sexual Minorities: Implications for Transgender, Gender Nonconforming, Pansexual, Demisexual, Asexual, Queer, and Questioning Individuals. Psychol Sex Orientation Gend Divers (2019) 6(1):54–63. doi:10.1037/sgd0000306
13. Hefner, J, and Eisenberg, D. Social Support and Mental Health Among College Students. Am J Orthopsychiatry (2009) 79(4):491–9. doi:10.1037/a0016918
14. Hysenbegasi, A, Hass, SL, and Rowland, CR. The Impact of Depression on the Academic Productivity of university Students. J Ment Health Pol Econ (2005) 8(3):145–51.
15. Chu, T, Liu, X, Takayanagi, S, Matsushita, T, and Kishimoto, H. Association Between Mental Health and Academic Performance Among university Undergraduates: The Interacting Role of Lifestyle Behaviors. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res (2023) 32(1):e1938. doi:10.1002/mpr.1938
16. Arria, AM, Caldeira, KM, Vincent, KB, Winick, ER, Baron, RA, and O'Grady, KE. Discontinuous College Enrollment: Associations with Substance Use and Mental Health. Psychiatr Serv (2013) 64(2):165–72. doi:10.1176/appi.ps.201200106
17. Cranford, JA, Eisenberg, D, and Serras, AM. Substance Use Behaviors, Mental Health Problems, and Use of Mental Health Services in a Probability Sample of College Students. Addict Behaviors (2009) 34(2):134–45. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2008.09.004
18. Serras, A, Saules, KK, Cranford, JA, and Eisenberg, D. Self-Injury, Substance Use, and Associated Risk Factors in a Multi-Campus Probability Sample of College Students. Psychol Addict Behaviors (2010) 24(1):119–28. doi:10.1037/a0017210
19. Tyson, P, Wilson, K, Crone, D, Brailsford, R, and Laws, K. Physical Activity and Mental Health in a Student Population. J Ment Health (2010) 19(6):492–9. doi:10.3109/09638230902968308
20. Eisenberg, D, Hunt, J, and Speer, N. Mental Health in American Colleges and Universities: Variation Across Student Subgroups and Across Campuses. J Nervous Ment Dis (2013) 201(1):60–7. doi:10.1097/NMD.0b013e31827ab077
21. Eden, J-L, Konnopka, A, and König, H-H. Kosten der Depression in Deutschland: Systematische Übersichtsarbeit [Costs of Depression in Germany: Systematic Review]. Psychiatrische Praxis (2021) 48(06):290–300. doi:10.1055/a-1399-4430
22. Holm-Hadulla, RM, Klimov, M, Juche, T, Möltner, A, and Herpertz, SC. Well-Being and Mental Health of Students During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Psychopathology (2021) 54(6):291–7. doi:10.1159/000519366
23. Supke, M, Hahlweg, K, Kelani, K, Muschalla, B, and Schulz, W. Mental Health, Partnerships, and Sexual Behavior of German University Students After the Third Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic. J Am Coll Health (2022) 1–10. doi:10.1080/07448481.2022.2119398
24. Werner, AM, Tibubos, AN, Mülder, LM, Reichel, JL, Schäfer, M, Heller, S, et al. The Impact of Lockdown Stress and Loneliness During the COVID-19 Pandemic on Mental Health Among University Students in Germany. Scientific Rep (2021) 11:22637. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-02024-5
25. Dogan-Sander, E, Kohls, E, Baldofski, S, and Rummel-Kluge, C. More Depressive Symptoms, Alcohol and Drug Consumption: Increase in Mental Health Symptoms Among University Students After One Year of the COVID-19 Pandemic. Front Psychiatry (2021) 12:790974. doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2021.790974
26. Matos Fialho, PM, Spatafora, F, Kühne, L, Busse, H, Helmer, SM, Zeeb, H, et al. Perceptions of Study Conditions and Depressive Symptoms during the COVID-19 Pandemic Among University Students in Germany: Results of the International COVID-19 Student Well-Being Study. Front Public Health (2021) 9(669):674665. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2021.674665
27. Seweryn, M, Tyrała, K, Kolarczyk-Haczyk, A, Bonk, M, Bulska, W, and Krysta, K. Evaluation of the Level of Depression Among Medical Students From Poland, Portugal and Germany. Psychiatria Danubina (2015) 27(Suppl. 1):216–22.
28. Bailer, J, Schwarz, D, Witthöft, M, Stübinger, C, and Rist, F. Prävalenz psychischer Syndrome bei Studierenden einer deutschen Universität [Prevalence of Mental Disorders Among College Students at a German University]. Psychotherapie Psychosomatik Medizinische Psychol (2008) 58(11):423–9. doi:10.1055/s-2007-986293
29. Kohls, E, Baldofski, S, Moeller, R, Klemm, SL, and Rummel-Kluge, C. Mental Health, Social and Emotional Well-Being, and Perceived Burdens of university Students During COVID-19 Pandemic Lockdown in Germany. Front Psychiatry (2021) 12:643957. doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2021.643957
30. Moher, D, Liberati, A, Tetzlaff, J, and Altman, DG, PRISMA Group. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. Br Med J (2009) 339:b2535. doi:10.1136/bmj.b2535
31. Ought Elicit. The AI Research Assistant (2023). Available from: https://elicit.org (Accessed July 26, 2023).
32. Ouzzani, M, Hammady, H, Fedorowicz, Z, and Elmagarmid, A. Rayyan—a Web and Mobile App for Systematic Reviews. Syst Rev (2016) 5(210):210. doi:10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4
33. Munn, Z, Barker, TH, Moola, S, Tufanaru, C, Stern, C, McArthur, A, et al. Methodological Quality of Case Series Studies: An Introduction to the JBI Critical Appraisal Tool. JBI Evid Synth (2020) 18(10):2127–33. doi:10.11124/JBISRIR-D-19-00099
34. Khan, MN, Akhtar, P, Ijaz, S, and Waqas, A. Prevalence of Depressive Symptoms Among University Students in Pakistan: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Public Health (2021) 8:603357. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2020.603357
35. Shorey, S, Ng, ED, and Wong, CH. Global Prevalence of Depression and Elevated Depressive Symptoms Among Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Br J Clin Psychol (2022) 61(2):287–305. doi:10.1111/bjc.12333
36. Borges, MC, Stein, C, Colpani, V, Munn, Z, and Falavigna, M, Prevalence Estimates Reviews – Systematic Review Methodology Group PERSyst. Quality Assessment of Prevalence Studies: A Systematic Review. J Clin Epidemiol (2020) 127:59–68. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.06.039
37. Stone, J, Gurunathan, U, Glass, K, Munn, Z, Tugwell, P, and Doi, SA. Stratification by Quality Induced Selection Bias in a Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials. J Clin Epidemiol (2019) 107:51–9. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.11.015
38. Borges, MC, Stein, C, Colpani, V, Barker, TH, Munn, Z, Falavigna, M, et al. How Are Systematic Reviews of Prevalence Conducted? A Methodological Study. BMC Med Res Methodol (2020) 20:96. doi:10.1186/s12874-020-00975-3
39. Higgins, JP, Thompson, SG, Deeks, JJ, and Altman, DG. Measuring Inconsistency in Meta-Analyses. Br Med J (2003) 327:557–60. doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557
40. Ahmed, I, Hazell, CM, Edwards, B, Glazebrook, C, and Davies, EB. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Studies Exploring Prevalence of Non-Specific Anxiety in Undergraduate University Students. BMC Psychiatry (2023) 23:240. doi:10.1186/s12888-023-04645-8
41. Berger, H, Franke, GH, Hofmann, F-H, Sperth, M, and Holm-Hadulla, RM. Mental Health of Students and its Development Between 1994 and 2012. Ment Health Prev (2015) 3(1-2):48–56. doi:10.1016/j.mhp.2015.01.001
42. Burger, P, Neumann, C, Ropohl, A, Paulsen, F, and Scholz, M. Development of Depression and Deterioration in Quality of Life in German Dental Medical Students in Preclinical Semesters. Ann Anat (2016) 208:183–6. doi:10.1016/j.aanat.2016.05.011
43. Mikolajczyk, RT, Maxwell , AE, El Ansari, W, Naydenova, V, Stock, C, Ilieva, S, et al. Prevalence of Depressive Symptoms in University Students From Germany, Denmark, Poland and Bulgaria. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol (2008) 43(2):105–12. doi:10.1007/s00127-007-0282-0
44. Page, MJ, McKenzie, JE, Bossuyt , PM, Boutron, I, Hoffmann, TC, Mulrow, CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 Statement: An Updated Guideline for Reporting Systematic Reviews. Br Med J (2021) 372:n71. doi:10.1136/bmj.n71
45. Karing, C. The Efficacy of Online Mindfulness-Based Interventions in a University Student Sample: Videoconference-or Podcast-Delivered Intervention. Appl Psychol Health Well-Being (2022) 15(2):740–56. doi:10.1111/aphw.12408
46. Heumann, E, Trümmler, J, Stock, C, Helmer, SM, Busse, H, Negash, S, et al. Study Conditions and university Students’ Mental Health During the Pandemic: Results of the COVID-19 German Student Well-Being Study (C19 GSWS). Int J Environ Res Public Health (2023) 20(7):5286. doi:10.3390/ijerph20075286
47. Prinz, P, Hertrich, K, Hirschfelder, U, and de Zwaan, M. Burnout, Depression and Depersonalisation--Psychological Factors and Coping Strategies in Dental and Medical Students. GMS Z für Medizinische Ausbildung. (2012) 29(1):Doc10. doi:10.3205/zma000780
48. Akhtar, M, Herwig, BK, and Faize, FA. Depression and Anxiety Among International Medical Students in Germany: The Predictive Role of Coping Styles. J Pakistan Med Assoc (2019) 69(2):230–4.
49. Bastemeyer, C, and Kleinert, J. Mental Health in Sports Students-A Cohort Study on Study-Related Stress, General Well-Being, and General Risk for Depression. J Phys Educ Sport (2021) 21(Suppl. 3):1958–66. doi:10.7752/jpes.2021.s3249
50. Burger, PH, Tektas, OY, Paulsen, F, and Scholz, M. Vom Studienstart bis zum ersten Staatsexamen–Zunahme von Depressivität bei gleichzeitigem Verlust des Kohärenzgefühls und der psychischen Lebensqualität in höheren Semestern Humanmedizin [From Freshmanship to the First “Staatsexamen” – Increase of Depression and Decline in Sense of Coherence and Mental Quality of Life in Advanced Medical Students]. Psychotherapie Psychosomatik Medizinische Psychol (2014) 64(08):322–7. doi:10.1055/s-0034-1374593
51. Burger, PH, and Scholz, M. Gender as an Underestimated Factor in Mental Health of Medical Students. Ann Anat (2018) 218:1–6. doi:10.1016/j.aanat.2018.02.005
52. Chow, WS, Schmidtke, J, Loerbroks, A, Muth, T, and Angerer, P. The Relationship Between Personality Traits with Depressive Symptoms and Suicidal Ideation Among Medical Students: A Cross-Sectional Study at One Medical School in Germany. Int J Environ Res Public Health (2018) 15(7):1462. doi:10.3390/ijerph15071462
53. Ehring, E, Frese, T, Fuchs, S, Dudo, K, Pukas, L, Stoevesandt, D, et al. Asking Future Doctors: What Support Options Do Medical Students Want to Cope with Medical School? J Public Health (2023) 31:115–22. doi:10.1007/s10389-020-01421-w
54. Eissler, C, Sailer, M, Walter, S, and Jerg-Bretzke, L. Psychische Gesundheit und Belastung bei Studierenden [Mental Health and Strain in Students]. Prävention und Gesundheitsförderung (2020) 15(3):242–9. doi:10.1007/s11553-019-00746-z
55. Feussner, O, Rehnisch, C, Rabkow, N, and Watzke, S. Somatization Symptoms-Prevalence and Risk, Stress and Resilience Factors Among Medical and Dental Students at a Mid-Sized German university. PeerJ (2022) 10:e13803. doi:10.7717/peerj.13803
56. Gecht, J, Kessel, R, Mainz, V, Gauggel, S, Drueke, B, Scherer, A, et al. Measuring Decentering in Self-Reports: Psychometric Properties of the Experiences Questionnaire in a German Sample. Psychotherapy Res (2014) 24(1):67–79. doi:10.1080/10503307.2013.821635
57. Gräßel, E, Lampen-Imkamp, S, Lehrl, S, and Kahl, KG. Psychische und somatische Beschwerden bei Medizinstudierenden: Eine Längsschnittuntersuchung [Screening of Emotional and Somatic Complaints in Undergraduate Medical Students: A Longitudinal Study]. Psychiatrische Praxis (2013) 40(01):30–5. doi:10.1055/s-0032-1327195
58. Guse, J, Heinen, I, Mohr, S, and Bergelt, C. Understanding Mental Burden and Factors Associated With Study Worries Among Undergraduate Medical Students during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Front Psychol (2021) 12:734264. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.734264
59. Halfmann, M, Wetzel, L, Castioni, N, Kiefer, F, König, S, Schmieder, A, et al. The Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Mental Burden and Quality of Life in Medical Students–Results of an Online Survey. GMS J Med Educ (2023) 40(2):Doc21. doi:10.3205/zma001603
60. Haussleiter, IS, Lorek, S, Zeschel, E, Mattausch, S, Meyers, M, and Juckel, G. At-Risk Symptoms of Bipolar Disorder in a University Student Cohort. Psychiatry Res (2018) 265:324–33. doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2018.05.010
61. Heinen, I, Bullinger, M, and Kocalevent, R-D. Perceived Stress in First Year Medical Students-Associations With Personal Resources and Emotional Distress. BMC Med Educ (2017) 17(1):4. doi:10.1186/s12909-016-0841-8
62. Hilger-Kolb, J, Diehl, K, Herr, R, and Loerbroks, A. Effort-Reward Imbalance Among Students at German Universities: Associations With Self-Rated Health and Mental Health. Int Arch Occup Environ Health (2018) 91:1011–20. doi:10.1007/s00420-018-1342-3
63. Huckert, T, and Krampen, G. Empirical Test of an Integrative Model Explaining Higher Prevalence of Subclinical Depression in Women: A Normative Sex-Role Orientation Approach. J Appl Biobehavioral Res (2010) 15(3):144–60. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9861.2010.00058.x
64. Jurkat, H, Höfer, S, Richter, L, Cramer, M, and Vetter, A. Lebensqualität, Stressbewältigung und Gesundheitsförderung bei Studierenden der Human-und Zahnmedizin: Eine Vergleichsuntersuchung [Quality of Life, Stress management and health promotion in medical and dental students: A comparative study]. Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift (2011) 136(23):1245–50. doi:10.1055/s-0031-1280544
65. Jurkat, H, Richter, L, Cramer, M, Vetter, A, Bedau, S, Leweke, F, et al. Depressivität und Stressbewältigung bei Medizinstudierenden: Eine Vergleichsuntersuchung des 1. und 7. Fachsemesters Humanmedizin [Depression and Stress Management in Medical Students: Acomparative Study Between Freshman and Advanced Medical Students]. Nervenarzt (2011) 82(5):646–52. doi:10.1007/s00115-010-3039-z
66. Kappner, N, Lang, J, Berthold, A, and Gaum, PM. The Moderating Effect of Social Resources on the Link Between Study-Related Stressors and Depressive Symptoms Among Medical Students in North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany–A Cross-Sectional Study. BMC Psychiatry (2022) 22(1):524. doi:10.1186/s12888-022-04170-0
67. Karing, C. Prevalence and Predictors of Anxiety, Depression and Stress Among University Students During the Period of the First Lockdown in Germany. J Affective Disord Rep (2021) 5:100174. doi:10.1016/j.jadr.2021.100174
68. Kindt, T, Rabkow, N, Pukas, L, Keuch, L, Sapalidis, A, Piloty-Leskien, A, et al. A Comparison of Depressive Symptoms in Medical and Psychology Students in Germany–Associations With Potential Risk and Resilience Factors. J Med Psychol (2022) 24(1):9–21. doi:10.3233/JMP-200023
69. Kohls, N, Büssing, A, Sauer, S, Rieß, J, Ulrich, C, Vetter, A, et al. Psychische Belastungen von Medizinstudierenden an den Universitäten München und Witten/Herdecke – ein Vergleich [Psychological Distress in Medical Students - A Comparison of the Universities of Munich and Witten/Herdecke]. Z für Psychosomatische Medizin Psychotherapie (2012) 58(4):409–16. doi:10.13109/zptm.2012.58.4.409
70. Kohls, E, Guenthner, L, Baldofski, S, Brock, T, Schuhr, J, and Rummel-Kluge, C. Two Years COVID-19 Pandemic: Development of University Students' Mental Health 2020–2022. Front Psychiatry (2023) 14:1122256. doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1122256
71. Kötter, T, Tautphäus, Y, Scherer, M, and Voltmer, E. Health-Promoting Factors in Medical Students and Students of Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics: Design and Baseline Results of a Comparative Longitudinal Study. BMC Med Educ (2014) 14:134. doi:10.1186/1472-6920-14-134
72. Kreß, V, Sperth, M, Hofmann, F-H, and Holm-Hadulla, RM. Psychological Complaints of Students: A Comparison of Field Samples With Clients of a Counseling Service at a Typical German University. Ment Health Prev (2015) 3(1-2):41–7. doi:10.1016/j.mhp.2015.04.002
73. Mekhemar, M, Attia, S, Dörfer, C, and Conrad, J. Dental Students in Germany throughout the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Psychological Assessment and Cross-Sectional Survey. Biology (2021) 10(7):611. doi:10.3390/biology10070611
74. Mikolajczyk, RT, Maxwell, AE, Naydenova, V, Meier, S, and El Ansari, W. Depressive Symptoms and Perceived Burdens Related to Being a Student: Survey in Three European Countries. Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health (2008) 4(1):19–9. doi:10.1186/1745-0179-4-19
75. Möller-Leimkühler, AM, and Mühleck, J. Development and Preliminary Validation of a Gender-Sensitive Depression Screening (GSDS). Psychiatrische Praxis (2020) 47(02):79–86. doi:10.1055/a-1067-0241
76. Möller-Leimkühler, AM, and Yücel, M. Male Depression in Females? J Affective Disord (2010) 121(1-2):22–9. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2009.05.007
77. Ochnik, D, Rogowska, AM, Kuśnierz, C, Jakubiak, M, Schütz, A, Held, MJ, et al. Mental Health Prevalence and Predictors Among University Students in Nine Countries During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-National Study. Scientific Rep (2021) 11(1):18644. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-97697-3
78. Pelzer, A, Sapalidis, A, Rabkow, N, Pukas, L, Günther, N, and Watzke, S. Does Medical School Cause Depression or Do Medical Students Already Begin Their Studies Depressed? A Longitudinal Study over the First Semester About Depression and Influencing Factors. GMS J Med Educ (2022) 39(5):Doc58. doi:10.3205/zma001579
79. Polujanski, S, Rotthoff, T, Nett, U, and Schindler, A-K. First-Year Medical Students’ Varying Vulnerability to Developing Depressive Symptoms and its Predictors: A Latent Profile Analysis. Acad Psychiatry (2023) 47(2):143–51. doi:10.1007/s40596-023-01757-x
80. Pukas, L, Rabkow, N, Keuch, L, Ehring, E, Fuchs, S, Stoevesandt, D, et al. Prevalence and Predictive Factors for Depressive Symptoms Among Medical Students in Germany–A Cross-Sectional Study. GMS J Med Educ (2022) 39(1):Doc13. doi:10.3205/zma001534
81. Schlarb, AA, Claßen, M, Hellmann, SM, Vögele, C, and Gulewitsch, MD. Sleep and Somatic Complaints in University Students. J Pain Res (2017) 10:1189–99. doi:10.2147/JPR.S125421
82. Schlarb, AA, Claßen, M, Grünwald, J, and Vögele, C. Sleep Disturbances and Mental Strain in University Students: Results From an Online Survey in Luxembourg and Germany. Int J Ment Health Syst (2017) 11:24. doi:10.1186/s13033-017-0131-9
83. Schunter, N, Glaesmer, H, Lucht, L, and Bahramsoltani, M. Depression, Suicidal Ideation and Suicide Risk in German Veterinary Medical Students Compared to the German General Population. PLOS one (2022) 17(8):e0270912. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0270912
84. Schwaab, L, Gebhardt, N, Friederich, H-C, and Nikendei, C. Climate Change Related Depression, Anxiety and Stress Symptoms Perceived by Medical Students. Int J Environ Res Public Health (2022) 19(15):9142. doi:10.3390/ijerph19159142
85. Seeliger, H, and Harendza, S. Is Perfect Good? Dimensions of Perfectionism in Newly Admitted Medical Students. BMC Med Educ (2017) 17:206. doi:10.1186/s12909-017-1034-9
86. Seliger, K, and Brähler, E. Psychische Gesundheit von Studierenden der Medizin. Eine empirische Untersuchung [Mental Health of Students of Medicine. An Empirical Study]. Psychotherapeut (2007) 52(4):280–6. doi:10.1007/s00278-006-0529-3
87. Tsiouris, A, Werner, AM, Tibubos, AN, Mülder, LM, Reichel, JL, Heller, S, et al. Mental Health State and its Determinants in German University Students Across the COVID-19 Pandemic: Findings From Three Repeated Cross-Sectional Surveys Between 2019 and 2021. Front Public Health (2023) 11:1163541. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2023.1163541
88. Velten, J, Scholten, S, Brailovskaia, J, and Margraf, J. Psychometric Properties of the S-Scale: Assessing a Psychological Mindset that Mediates the Relationship Between Socioeconomic Status and Depression. PloS one (2021) 16(10):e0258333. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0258333
89. Voltmer, E, Kötter, T, and Spahn, C. Perceived Medical School Stress and the Development of Behavior and Experience Patterns in German Medical Students. Med Teach (2012) 34(10):840–7. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2012.706339
90. Weber, M, Schulze, L, Bolzenkötter, T, Niemeyer, H, and Renneberg, B. Mental Health and Loneliness in university Students During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Germany: A Longitudinal Study. Front Psychiatry (2022) 13:848645. doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2022.848645
91. Weber, R, Eggenberger, L, Stosch, C, and Walther, A. Gender Differences in Attachment Anxiety and Avoidance and Their Association With Psychotherapy Use—Examining Students From a German university. Behav Sci (2022) 12(7):204. doi:10.3390/bs12070204
92. Wege, N, Muth, T, Li, J, and Angerer, P. Mental Health Among Currently Enrolled Medical Students in Germany. Public Health (2016) 132:92–100. doi:10.1016/j.puhe.2015.12.014
93. Wörfel, F, Gusy, B, Lohmann, K, Töpritz, K, and Kleiber, D. Mental Health Problems Among University Students and the Impact of Structural Conditions. J Public Health (2016) 24:125–33. doi:10.1007/s10389-015-0703-6
94. Naing, L, Winn, T, and Rusli, B. Practical Issues in Calculating the Sample Size for Prevalence Studies. Arch Orofacial Sci (2006) 1:9–16.
95. Daniel, WW. Biostatistics: A Foundation for Analysis in the Health Sciences. 7th ed. New York: Wiley (1999).
96. Auerbach, RP, Alonso, J, Axinn, WG, Cuijpers, P, Ebert, DD, Green, JG, et al. Mental Disorders Among College Students in the World Health Organization World Mental Health Surveys. Psychol Med (2016) 46(14):2955–70. doi:10.1017/S0033291716001665
97. Lange, C, Finger, JD, Allen, J, Born, S, Hoebel, J, Kuhnert, R, et al. Implementation of the European Health Interview Survey (EHIS) Into the German Health Update (GEDA). Arch Public Health (2017) 75:40. doi:10.1186/s13690-017-0208-6
98. Luo, W, Zhong, BL, and Chiu, HF. Prevalence of Depressive Symptoms Among Chinese University Students Amid the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci (2021) 30:e31. doi:10.1017/s2045796021000202
99. Muniz, FWM, Maurique, LS, Toniazzo, MP, Silva, CF, and Casarin, M. Self-Reported Depressive Symptoms in Dental Students: Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis. J Dental Educ (2021) 85(2):135–47. doi:10.1002/jdd.12408
100. Volken, T, Zysset, A, Amendola, S, Klein Swormink, A, Huber, M, von Wyl, A, et al. Depressive Symptoms in Swiss University Students During the COVID-19 Pandemic and its Correlates. Int J Environ Res Public Health (2021) 18(4):1458. doi:10.3390/ijerph18041458
101. Deng, J, Zhou, F, Hou, W, Silver, Z, Wong, CY, Chang, O, et al. The Prevalence of Depressive Symptoms, Anxiety Symptoms and Sleep Disturbance in Higher Education Students During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Psychiatry Res (2021) 301:113863. doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2021.113863
102. Chang, J-J, Ji, Y, Li, Y-H, Pan, H-F, and Su, P-Y. Prevalence of Anxiety Symptom and Depressive Symptom Among College Students During COVID-19 Pandemic: A Meta-Analysis. J Affective Disord (2021) 292:242–54. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2021.05.109
103. Weierstall-Pust, R, Schnell, T, Heßmann, P, Feld, M, Höfer, M, Plate, A, et al. Stressors Related to the Covid-19 Pandemic, Climate Change, and the Ukraine Crisis, and Their Impact on Stress Symptoms in Germany: Analysis of Cross-Sectional Survey Data. BMC Public Health (2022) 22(1):2233. doi:10.1186/s12889-022-14682-9
104. Voltmer, E, Köslich-Strumann, S, Voltmer, JB, and Kötter, T. Stress and Behavior Patterns Throughout Medical Education - A Six Year Longitudinal Study. BMC Med Educ (2021) 21(1):454. doi:10.1186/s12909-021-02862-x
105. Rancic, NKB, Stevic, S, Ilic, M, Stojanovic, M, and Stojanovic, M. Prevalence of Depressive Symptoms in Medical Students. Acta Med Medianae (2019) 58(4):18–25. doi:10.5633/amm.2019.0403
106. Tam, W, Lo, K, and Pacheco, J. Prevalence of Depressive Symptoms Among Medical Students: Overview of Systematic Reviews. Med Educ (2019) 53(4):345–54. doi:10.1111/medu.13770
107. Von Elm, E, Altman, DG, Egger, M, Pocock, SJ, Gøtzsche, PC, Vandenbroucke, JP, et al. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies. The Lancet (2007) 370(9596):1453–7. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61602-X
Keywords: depression symptoms, higher education students, mental health, meta-analysis, prevalence
Citation: Heumann E, Palacio Siebe AV, Stock C and Heinrichs K (2024) Depressive Symptoms Among Higher Education Students in Germany—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Public Health Rev 45:1606983. doi: 10.3389/phrs.2024.1606983
Received: 18 December 2023; Accepted: 20 May 2024;
Published: 10 June 2024.
Edited by:
Diogo Costa, Bielefeld University, GermanyReviewed by:
Cristina Teixeira, University of Porto, PortugalNicole Bizzotto, University of Italian Switzerland, Switzerland
Copyright © 2024 Heumann, Palacio Siebe, Stock and Heinrichs. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
PHR is edited by the Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+) in a partnership with the Association of Schools of Public Health of the European Region (ASPHER)+
*Correspondence: Eileen Heumann, eileen.heumann@charite.de