Skip to main content

COMMENTARY

Int J Public Health, 13 February 2024

Public-Private Sector Mix Approach to Achieving Effective, Efficient and Value-Added TB Programming in Nigeria: Lessons Learned

Ifeanyi OkekearuIfeanyi OkekearuOnyinye Ojeh
Onyinye Ojeh*Kenneth OkoinemeKenneth OkoinemeJane AdizueJane AdizueYusuf H. WadaYusuf H. WadaElizabeth AdeyemoElizabeth AdeyemoJennifer AnyantiJennifer AnyantiAbdullahi Musa YolaAbdullahi Musa YolaAbubakar Sadiq UmarAbubakar Sadiq Umar
  • Society for Family Health Nigeria, Abuja, Nigeria

Background

Among all infectious diseases, tuberculosis (TB) is the leading cause of death worldwide, and Nigeria ranks second in Africa and sixth out of the eight nations with the highest TB burden globally [1]. In Nigeria, TB treatment is mostly through public health facilities [2], even though the private health sector remains the first point of call for over 60% of Nigerians [3]. Private health facilities include clinics, standalone medical laboratories, community pharmacies, nursing homes, proprietary patent medicine vendors (PPMV), faith-based clinics, traditional/herbal homes, and others. In a public-private sector-driven health system such as Nigeria, private health providers are very important stakeholders in tuberculosis diagnosis and management. The level of collaboration and involvement of the private health sectors in Nigeria in TB case findings, treatment, and notification remains below expectations, little wonder why Nigeria is rated as one of the top 4 countries in the world with missing TB cases [4]. Therefore, Society for Family Health, through its TB LON 1&2 project provides recommendations in advancing actions towards an active private-public mix (PPM) approach to achieving effective and efficient TB management in Nigeria.

Nigerian TB Context and the Private Sector

Nigeria was among the very few countries that recorded an increase in TB notifications in 2020 at the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, the attendant lockdown and other measures introduced to combat the pandemic [5]. These affected all spheres of human endeavour, including health services. The country, since 2019, has recorded a significant and consistent increase in the annual TB notification [4]. Nigeria recorded a massive increase in the annual TB notification in 2021 when the TB case notification increased by 50% from 138,591 in 2020 to 207,785 TB cases in 2021. Many factors are responsible for this progress, including the rising consciousness and efforts by private healthcare providers and facilities in case finding, treatment and notification [4]. The World Health Organisation (WHO) has emphasized the significance of the public sector playing a stewardship role in involving private care providers in efforts to achieve the public health goal of tuberculosis control [1]. Considerable evidence has shown that PPM is successful in reducing patient burden, increasing case notification, and improving treatment outcomes [5]. For example, a cross-sectional study highlighted that, in comparison to public health facilities in Kaduna State, private facilities comply with national guidelines, have a higher case load of TB patients, and record better treatment outcomes [6]. While patient contact screening was extremely low in both facilities, records were better completed in private facilities [7]. In a similar study conducted in India, PPM was reported to have resulted in a 12% increase in TB case notifications [8]. TB case notification and treatment success rates were significantly enhanced in Myanmar when private general practitioners (GPs) were involved in tuberculosis management [9]. Overall, these studies highlight the need for countries to utilize the full capacity of all healthcare providers in either public or private facilities [10].

Recommendations

Based on the identified challenges and recognising the importance of the PPM in strengthening TB programming, we provided recommendations as priority actions in line with the established Task Shifting and Task Sharing (TSTS) policy in Nigeria [7].

Promote and Support the Private Health Sector and Providers to Participate More in Provider-Initiated Mobilisation and Case Findings

Screening allows detecting tuberculosis in the latent stages of its development and undertaking timely measures to prevent it from transitioning into the active and contagious stage. In this way, it will be possible to minimise the costs associated with the treatment of the infection. To eradicate tuberculosis in Nigeria, efforts by the government agencies such as NTBLCP, in collaboration with other relevant actors, such as donors and the private sector, must be directed at the prevention of the disease through awareness-raising activities and promotion of screening exercises.

Institutional Strengthening and Capacity Support for Private Providers and Facilities to Have Requisite Knowledge and Capacity for TB Programming

The knowledge of risk factors contributing to the development of tuberculosis, as well as positive individual and public attitudes to this infection, are linked to engagement in protective behaviours and favourable perceptions of such preventive practices as screening. In contrast, the lack of knowledge and tuberculosis-related stigma characterized by perceived incurability, beliefs about the etymology of the infection, and negative views on associations of tuberculosis with HIV often result in non-disclosure of the disease, non-compliance with treatment, low self-esteem, ridicule, social exclusion, and so forth. The government’s role through the NTBLCP efforts should also be channelled towards strengthening institutions and providing capacity support for private providers to improve TB programming.

Strengthen Policies to Promote Effective PPM

While the government has acknowledged that to promote greater private sector involvement in the provision of public services and draw private capital to finance the nation’s infrastructure and related services, it will need to strengthen its policies and practices to advance the cause. Actions such as offering a clear institutional and policy framework for PPM and effectively communicating its policies to the policymakers, the public, and investors will go a long way in creating an enabling policy environment for PPM.

Resourcing

While commitment from donors to support efforts to increase local ownership and sustainability of the TB response in Nigeria exists, efforts to build the capacity of private providers at a local level and help communities tailor their own solutions to TB prevention and treatment need to be intensified. Substantial efforts to enhance the procurement and supply chain management system, health management information systems, surveillance systems, human resources for health, governance and financing, capacity building and incentive for the private sector are imperative. The incorporation of TB management in the range of treatments offered by the National and State Health Insurance Schemes, as well as the 1% consolidated revenue of the Basic Healthcare Provision Fund (BHCPF), should be leveraged. The government should push for a formal involvement of the State Oversight Committees across states to acquaint them with the BHCPF implementation and encourage them to fulfil its intended objectives.

Incentivising PPM

Effective PPM for tuberculosis management has been found to thrive on the availability of several factors, including incentives [4]. Patient and provider involvement in TB case detection, diagnosis, and treatment can be encouraged by utilising incentives to engage private providers. To create verifiable and trustworthy incentive systems, donors will need useful insights about providers’ and users’ microeconomics and motivations. For providers, maintaining an active TB practice is not financially rewarding and may even be self-defeating. Thus, financial incentives can encourage them to increase their understanding or practice of managing TB. Other non-financial incentives can be utilised such as awarding, certifying, or recognizing service providers. This kind of distinction could help private service providers stand out from competitors and broaden their clientele. Using moral persuasion to influence a provider’s sense of social duty and providing access to discounted health supplies, networking opportunities, and capacity building sessions are also proven incentives for promoting effective PPM.

Conclusion

While Nigeria is making progress with TB case finding and notification, it is imperative to scale the PPM to enhance the chances of finding thousands of missing TB cases. We have provided recommendations which serve as key instruments for a more cohesive and integrated health system.

Author Contributions

Conceived and Designed the study: JeA, IO, JaA. Contributed to data collection and analysis: AY, AU, OO. Wrote the draft of paper: YW, KO, EA. Review and Approved the paper: All authors listed have made a substantial, direct, and intellectual contribution to the work and approved it for publication.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they do not have any conflicts of interest.

References

1. World Health Organisation. Global Tuberculosis Report, 2020. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO (2020).

Google Scholar

2. Danlami, MB, Basiru, A, Tajjudeen, Y, Bazata, AY, Gulumbe, BH, and Mohammed, M. Tuberculosis Treatment Outcomes Among Pulmonary TB Patients Attending Public Hospitals in Kebbi State, Northern Nigeria: A Four-Year Retrospective Study. Bull Natl Res Centre (2022) 46(1):281. doi:10.1186/s42269-022-00969-9

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Aregbeshola, BS, and Khan, SM. Out-of-Pocket Payments, Catastrophic Health Expenditure and Poverty Among Households in Nigeria 2010. Int J Health Pol Manag (2018) 7(9):798–806. doi:10.15171/ijhpm.2018.19

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. World Health Organisation. Engaging Private Health Care Providers in TB Care and Prevention: A Landscape Analysis. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO (2021).

Google Scholar

5. Oga-Omenka, C, Sassi, A, Vasquez, NA, Baruwa, E, Rosapep, L, Daniels, B, et al. Tuberculosis Service Disruptions and Adaptations During the First Year of the COVID-19 Pandemic in the Private Health Sector of Two Urban Settings in Nigeria-A Mixed Methods Study. PLOS Glob Public Health (2023) 3(3):e0001618. doi:10.1371/journal.pgph.0001618

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Gidado, M, and Ejembi, CL. Tuberculosis Case Management and Treatment Outcome: Assessment of the Effectiveness of Public-Private Mix of Tuberculosis Programme in Kaduna State, Nigeria. Ann Afr Med (2009) 8(1):25–31. doi:10.4103/1596-3519.55760

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Dajo, U, and Akor, L. Impact of Social Unrest on Nigeria’s Socio-Economic Development. Int J Public Adm Manag Res (2022) 7(4):16–27. doi:10.36758/ijpamr/v7n4.2022/02

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Lal, SS, Sahu, S, Wares, F, Lönnroth, K, Chauhan, LS, and Uplekar, M. Intensified Scale-Up of Public-Private Mix: A Systems Approach to Tuberculosis Care and Control in India. Int J tuberculosis Lung Dis (2011) 15(1):97–104.

Google Scholar

9. Maung, M, Kluge, H, Aye, T, Maung, W, Noe, P, Zaw, M, et al. Private GPs Contribute to TB Control in Myanmar: Evaluation of a PPM Initiative in Mandalay Division. Int J Tuberculosis Lung Dis (2006) 10(9):982–7.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

10. Okoroafor, SC, and Christmals, CD. Task Shifting and Task Sharing Implementation in Africa: A Scoping Review on Rationale and Scope. Healthcare (Basel) (2023) 11(8):1200. doi:10.3390/healthcare11081200

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: public-private mix, tuberculosis, PPM, TB, Nigeria

Citation: Okekearu I, Ojeh O, Okoineme K, Adizue J, Wada YH, Adeyemo E, Anyanti J, Yola AM and Umar AS (2024) Public-Private Sector Mix Approach to Achieving Effective, Efficient and Value-Added TB Programming in Nigeria: Lessons Learned. Int J Public Health 69:1606807. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2024.1606807

Received: 04 November 2023; Accepted: 29 January 2024;
Published: 13 February 2024.

Edited by:

Lyda Osorio, University of the Valley, Colombia

Copyright © 2024 Okekearu, Ojeh, Okoineme, Adizue, Wada, Adeyemo, Anyanti, Yola and Umar. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Onyinye Ojeh, ojehonyinye@gmail.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.