AUTHOR=Savard Lamothe Ashley , Gabet Morgane , Richard Zoé , Oliveira Sydia Rosana de Araujo , Coulibaly Abdouramane , Cazarin Gisèle , Zacarias Amanda , Gautier Lara , Ridde Valéry , Zinszer Kate 

TITLE=A Descriptive Comparison of Mass Testing During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Montreal, Paris, Bamako, and Recife

JOURNAL=International Journal of Public Health

VOLUME=67

YEAR=2022

URL=https://www.ssph-journal.org/journals/international-journal-of-public-health/articles/10.3389/ijph.2022.1604992

DOI=10.3389/ijph.2022.1604992

ISSN=1661-8564

ABSTRACT=<p><bold>Objective:</bold> The aim of this descriptive article was to compare mass testing for SARS-CoV-2 during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in Montreal, Canada; Bamako, Mali; Paris, France; and Recife, Brazil.</p><p><bold>Methods:</bold> Data was collected through interviews with key informants involved in the testing response and a review of the grey literature. The TIDieR-PHP checklist was then used to provide the basis of the intervention descriptions and to compare the data between cities.</p><p><bold>Results:</bold> Descriptive comparisons revealed that the type of test, the testing process, and materials used were similar between the cities during the first wave of the pandemic. In addition, all cities experienced similar material and personnel resource shortages, directly affecting testing accessibility and capacity. The main differences were related to testing capacity and implementation timelines, which were dependent on the state of the health care systems, governance, and access to resources.</p><p><bold>Conclusion:</bold> Results of this study highlight the similarities and differences in testing between the cities and demonstrate the importance of comprehensive intervention descriptions to highlight lessons learned, increase knowledge sharing, and inform policy decisions.</p>