AUTHOR=Shekriladze Ia , Javakhishvili Nino , Butsashvili Nino , Lortkipanidze Maka 

TITLE=Anxiety, Worry, Life Satisfaction and Coping During the Acute VS Prolonged Pandemic Stress: Evidence From a Repeated Cross-Sectional Study

JOURNAL=International Journal of Public Health

VOLUME=67

YEAR=2022

URL=https://www.ssph-journal.org/journals/international-journal-of-public-health/articles/10.3389/ijph.2022.1604650

DOI=10.3389/ijph.2022.1604650

ISSN=1661-8564

ABSTRACT=<p><bold>Objectives:</bold> The COVID-19 pandemic remains a continuous stressor worldwide. Our study aimed at comparing the data of waves from two lockdowns in Georgia, one in the acute stress phase (May 2020) and the other in the prolonged stress phase (December 2020).</p><p><bold>Methods:</bold> In total, 750 and 716 individuals participated in the study with a repeated cross-sectional design. Sample equivalence was reached <italic>via</italic> controlling demographic variables. Anxiety, COVID-19 worry, and life satisfaction were measured along with coping behaviors and four coping styles—information-accessing/processing and action-planning (two problem-focused coping styles), and passive-submissive and avoidant (two emotion-focused coping styles).</p><p><bold>Results:</bold> As pandemic prolonged, mental health indicators worsened, the action-planning style and behavioral coping decreased, while the information-accessing/processing style increased. The link between the COVID-19 worry and the action-planning coping style was strong in the acute stage and dissapeared in the prolonged stage. The individual context, namely, a history of coronavirus in the household, accounted for lower protective behaviors and higher information seeking in the prolonged phase.</p><p><bold>Conclusion:</bold> The findings highlighted the importance of timing and general and individual contexts in coping with the pandemic.</p>