Sofia Guerra-Paiva1,2*
Irene Carrillo3
José Mira3,4
Joana Fernandes5
Reinhard Strametz6
Eva Gil-Hernández4
Paulo Sousa1,2- 1Public Health Research Centre, NOVA National School of Public Health, NOVA University of Lisbon, Lisboa, Portugal
- 2Comprehensive Health Research Center, NOVA National School of Public Health, NOVA University of Lisbon, Lisboa, Portugal
- 3Department of Health Psychology, Miguel Hernández University, Elche, Spain
- 4Fundación para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de la Comunitat Valenciana (FISABIO), Valencia, Spain
- 5NOVA National School of Public Health, NOVA University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Lisboa, Portugal
- 6Wiesbaden Business School, RheinMain University of Applied Sciences, Wiesbaden, Germany
A Corrigendum on
Developing Core Indicators for Evaluating Second Victim Programs: An International Consensus Approach
by Guerra-Paiva S, Carrillo I, Mira J, Fernandes J, Strametz R, Gil-Hernández E, Sousa P. Int J Public Health. 69:1607428. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2024.1607428
There was an error in Affiliation 1. Instead of “NOVA University of Lisbon, Public Health Research Centre, Lisboa, Portugal” it should be “Public Health Research Centre, NOVA National School of Public Health, NOVA University of Lisbon, Lisboa, Portugal.”
There was an error in Affiliation 2. Instead of “Comprehensive Health Research Center, CHRC, NOVA University of Lisbon, Lisboa, Portugal” it should be “Comprehensive Health Research Center, NOVA National School of Public Health, NOVA University of Lisbon, Lisboa, Portugal.”
There was an error in Affiliation 5. Instead of “National School of Public Health, NOVA University of Lisbon, Lisboa, Portugal” it should be “NOVA National School of Public Health, NOVA University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Lisboa, Portugal”.
In the first published version of the article there was an error in the Acknowledgements section. The section previously stated:
“This work was supported by ERNST COST Action 19113 (COST–European Cooperation in Science and Technology, www.cost.eu). We extend our acknowledgments to the members of ERNST and invited experts who generously participated in this study.”
This has changed to:
“This article is based upon work from COST Action, The ERNST Group (The European Researchers’ Network Working on Second Victims), CA19113, supported by COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology). We extend our acknowledgments to the members of ERNST and invited experts who generously participated in this study.”
The authors apologize for these errors and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The first published incorrect version of the article has been updated.
Keywords: patient safety, second victim, programs, evaluation, indicators
Citation: Guerra-Paiva S, Carrillo I, Mira J, Fernandes J, Strametz R, Gil-Hernández E and Sousa P (2024) Corrigendum: Developing Core Indicators for Evaluating Second Victim Programs: An International Consensus Approach. Int J Public Health 69:1608061. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2024.1608061
Received: 18 October 2024; Accepted: 25 October 2024;
Published: 07 November 2024.
Approved by:
International Journal of Public Health Editorial Office, Frontiers Media SA, SwitzerlandCopyright © 2024 Guerra-Paiva, Carrillo, Mira, Fernandes, Strametz, Gil-Hernández and Sousa. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Sofia Guerra-Paiva, c2cucGFpdmFAZW5zcC51bmwucHQ=