Ketong Xu
Jiuqiang Fu2*- 1Tangshan Research Institute, Beijing Institute of Technology, Tangshan, China
- 2School of Design and Arts, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, China
Objective: In countries with conservative attitudes towards sex and limited resources to prevent child sexual abuse, culturally adapted CSA prevention programs are essential. This study outlines a randomized controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of the Doll program for preventing CSA in the specific context of China.
Method: 181 children were pre-tested and post-tested (5 weeks later) for knowledge of sexual abuse prevention. Children were assigned to one of three groups; 1) child only (n = 60); 2) child and parent (n = 60); and 3) control (n = 61).
Results: Children in groups 1 and 2 showed significant increases (p < 0.001) in scores on the Appropriate Touch Scale (ATS) and the Inappropriate Touch Scale (ITS), whereas those in the control group did not show a significant increase in ATS scores, but their scores on ITS significantly increased (p < 0.001). Children in group 2 showed significantly increased ITS scores compared to group 1 (p = 0.016).
Conclusion: Doll program effectively enhances children’s CSA prevention knowledge, with parental engagement demonstrating a positive impact on the program.
Introduction
CSA Prevalence and Prevention in China
Despite the rights of children to be safeguarded against all forms of violence, including sexual abuse, Child sexual abuse (CSA) remains a grave public health issue affecting children across diverse cultures and societies, with severe negative consequences for victims, their families, the social environment, and society as a whole [1–4]. Cultural norms related to parenting, discipline, family dynamics, and sexuality may influence the prevalence, forms, definitions, characteristics, and impact of child sexual abuse in different regions [5, 6].
China, being a hierarchical society with strong Confucian ideology, exhibits certain cultural aspects that may contribute to child sexual abuse [7]. For instance, the moral code of filial piety expects children to unquestioningly obey their parents, even if they are subjected to scolding or physical punishment, which is viewed as an expression of care [6]. The traditional Chinese cultural suppression of sexual topics makes it challenging for Chinese children to discuss sexuality and express experiences of sexual victimization [8]. Moreover, Chinese families often discourage CSA victims from disclosing their experiences to avoid bringing shame to the family [6].
With the rise of Internet technology, child sexual abuse is gaining more visibility in China. Shifts social values have led to increased awareness of “child abuse,” with the Chinese term “Nue Tong” being used to define child victimization [7]. Although several studies have shown the benefits of formal, systematic, and repeated training through school-based CSA prevention programs [9–17], these school-based CSA prevention programs, which incorporate educational materials such as courses and dramatic performances may not be fully applicable in China because of the lack of systematic education faculty [18], and their preparation and implementation may be impractical due to time and resource constraints in schools [19, 20]. Particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic, school-based interventions became unfeasible, emphasizing the importance of remote digital interventions as promising solutions for addressing resource limitations and expanding reach [21–23]. Additionally, discussing sexuality in public remains sensitive in China, making it challenging to implement abstract CSA prevention concepts that young children may struggle to comprehend. Moreover, a variety of digital resources for child sexual abuse (CSA) prevention education have been created to enhance program suitability for different age groups, increase engagement, and improve accessibility [16], [24–29].
Description of the Doll Program
The Doll program is based on the aforementioned context of sexuality education in China and is specifically tailored for lower elementary school students. The Doll program is designed to address the challenges of limited educational resources, particularly the absence of sex education curricula in schools and the broader family environment. Therefore, the e-educational toolkit consisting of digital textual materials and engaging simple serious games as educational materials was developed for Doll program. While in the e-education toolkit, we use a lot of doll images to represent a lot of different characters in real life, such as strangers, doctors, parents, etc., so the name of the program is Doll.
The content of CSA prevention in the Doll program is anchored in UNESCO’s 2018 International Guidelines for Sexuality Education (Revised) [30] and Chinese textbooks dedicated to elementary school children’s sexuality education—specifically, the 12-volume Cherishing Life series edited by Wenli Liu [31, 32]. Illustrated in Figure 1, the content is organized into three main chapters: body basics, body awareness, and safety skills.
FIGURE 1. Description of the Doll program and the toolkit (China, 2022).
The content of the e-educational toolkit aligns with the three aforementioned chapters. The development the toolkit (Figure 1) employed a co-design approach [33–36], involving various stakeholders, including parents, teachers, designers, and engineers. The e-text materials in the toolkit comprehensively cover the knowledge to be acquired in each chapter, accompanied by corresponding assignments. The toolkit’s games aim to enhance children’s understanding of abstract concepts through images, thereby fostering interest in learning. These games take the form of jigsaw puzzles, role-playing, and simulation situations. Given its specific design for Chinese children in the early elementary grades, the toolkit currently supports Chinese characters and Pinyin languages.
In our quest to assess the efficacy of the Doll program, we delve into the fundamental question: Does students’ knowledge of sexual abuse prevention experience a meaningful shift from pre to post-test? Drawing from a wealth of previous research highlighting the positive impact of parental involvement in CSA prevention programs [11], [37–39], we extended an invitation to children’s parents to actively participate in the evaluation. Thus, we have formulated the following hypotheses:
Hypothesis 1:. Active participation in the Doll program will result in a significant improvement in students’ understanding of child sexual abuse compared to their counterparts who did not partake in the program.
Hypothesis 2:. Within the Doll program participants, we anticipate that the child and parent group will demonstrate a notably more pronounced enhancement in child sexual abuse knowledge compared to the child-only group.
Methods
Participants
In the initial phase, we assessed the eligibility of 260 children with a Chinese cultural background from a prominent public elementary school in Beijing, China. Insights into their physical and cognitive status were gathered through information provided by their class teachers. Inclusion criteria required that children could understand and use the toolkit normally. However, five children exhibiting severe motor impairments, such as broken bones and an inability to write at the time of assessment, were excluded from the Doll program. Consent was obtained from both the children and their caregivers through the signing of an informed consent form. Unfortunately, 74 caregivers did not agree to participate, leading to the subsequent exclusion of 79 children. Ultimately, 181 children actively participated in the Doll evaluation. Among the participants, 49.2% were females (N = 89), and 50.8% were males (N = 92). The participants had an average age of 6.12, with a standard deviation of 0.78.
Measures
The Children’s Knowledge of Abuse Questionnaire (CKAQ-RIII), developed by researchers based on previous studies, was utilized in this study to assess sexual abuse prevention knowledge among children [40–43]. The CKAQ-RIII comprises 33 items, with 9 items constituting the Appropriate Touch Scale (ATS) and 24 items forming the Inappropriate Touch Scale (ITS). ATS addresses concepts like appropriate touch, such as a doctor needing to examine private parts or seeking help from an unfamiliar security guard. ITS focuses on encompassing different touch types and encouraging children to communicate discomfort. The reliability of ITS and ATS within the CKAQ-RIII scale has been demonstrated in studies using either partial or full versions, including non-English speaking samples [16, 17, 41], [44–49]. This substantiates the CKAQ-RIII as a robust tool for evaluating children’s knowledge of sexual abuse prevention, supporting its application in both research and practical contexts.
The Chinese version of CKAQ-RIII has been utilized in previous studies [11, 50]. In the Chinese version of the questionnaire, “True,” “False,” or “I don’t know” was replaced with “Agree,” “Disagree,” and “Don’t know” as response options. A score of 1 was assigned to correct responses, whereas incorrect, “Don’t know,” or blank answers received a score of 0. In our study, the ITS (24 items) demonstrated strong internal consistency (α = 0.791), while the ATS (9 items) exhibited slightly lower reliability (α = 0.712). This level of reliability is considered acceptable and aligns with findings in other studies [11, 46, 50].
Procedure
We obtained parental consent for all participating children, and the study protocol was approved by the ethical Institutional Review Board (IRB) at Beijing Institute of Technology.
A total of 181 children from 5 classes participated in the program and were randomly assigned to groups 1, 2, or 3. Group 3 served as the control group and did not participate in the Doll program (control group, n = 61). Group 1 used the toolkit alone (child only group, n = 60) in the Doll program. Group 2 used the toolkit with their parents (child and parent group, n = 60) in the Doll program.
Parents were briefed on research procedures, measures used, and participant rights during parental meetings. The Doll program was offered as an extracurricular school activity for group 1 children. Group 1 children completed the toolkit in the school’s multimedia classroom, supervised by two trained teachers. Group 1 teachers ensured that students used the toolkit individually. Group 2 children, using devices such as cell phones, tablets, or computers, completed the toolkit at home as part of their regular homework assignments with their parents. Parents actively engaged in their children’s toolkit use, guiding them, and participating in discussions.
Quizzes or tasks were implemented at the conclusion of each chapter of the e-toolkit to ensure children’s active involvement in learning. Additionally, parents in group 2 were provided with a paper version of the family learning log. They were asked to record their progress after finishing each chapter, ensuring active involvement in shared learning.
The CKAQ-RIII (Chinese version) was assessed twice during the summer trimester of the 2022 school year: 1) at time 1, to gauge children’s understanding of CSA concepts before the intervention, and 2) at time 2, around 5 weeks later following their involvement in the Doll program. In all cases, the administrator verbally repeated each question twice, giving every child sufficient time to respond or seek clarification. Overall, the children exhibited a strong understanding of the questions, and the need for repetition was minimal.
Students in groups 1 and 2 who did not complete at least 50 percent of the tasks or quizzes in the toolkit, as well as students in group 2 with predominantly blank home learning logs (fewer than three entries), and those who missed the tests due to illness, were excluded from the analysis. The final evaluation (Figure 2) included a total of 167 students: group 1 (child only), n = 54; group 2 (child and parent), n = 53; group 3 (control), n = 60.
FIGURE 2. Sampling procedure of the study participants (China, 2022).
Data Analysis
We conducted a comprehensive analysis using Two-Way Mixed ANOVA to examine the interaction, main, and simple effects of the three groups on the two scales at two time points (Table 1). Subsequently, we performed separate multiple comparisons for the three groups’ scores on the two scales at each time point, employing the Bonferroni correction method (Table 2).
TABLE 1. Main, interaction effects, and simple effects analysis (China, 2022).
TABLE 2. Pairwise comparisons of inappropriate and appropriate touch scores among three groups at two time points adjusted by Bonferroni (China, 2022).
Results
Our data adhered to normal distribution assumptions (Shapiro-Wilk’s test, p > 0.05) and demonstrated homogeneity in both variances (Levene’s test, p > 0.05) and covariances (Box’s M test, p > 0.001). The following sections present detailed results of this data analysis for each scale.
ATS: Appropriate Touch Scale
ATS scores showed a significant interaction involving group and time [F (2, 164) = 6.263, p = 0.002, partial η2 = 0.071]. The effect of time was significant, indicating differences in ATS scores over time [F (1, 164) = 19.258, p < 0.001, partial η2 = 0.105]. Conversely, the influence of different groups did not uncover substantial distinctions in mean ATS scores [F (2, 164) = 0.868, p = 0.422, partial η2 = 0.010].
With regard to the simple effects of group (Table 1), there were no significant differences in children’s knowledge observed at time 1 (pre-test), F (2, 164) = 0.023, p = 0.977, partial η2 = 0.000. However, there was still no statistically significantly difference in all 3 groups at time 2 after the intervention, F (2, 164) = 2.792, p = 0.064, partial η2 = 0.033.
Regarding the simple effects of time (Table 1), ATS scores for students in group 1 (child only) exhibited a noteworthy enhancement from time 1 to time 2, F (1, 53) = 12.550, p = 0.001, partial η2 = 0.071. Similarly, ATS scores significantly improved for students in group 2 (child and parent) between the initial assessment to the follow-up evaluation, F (1, 52) = 17.546, p < 0.001, partial η2 = 0.097. Nevertheless, no statistically significant disparity emerged in ATS scores for students in group 3 (control group) from the baseline evaluation to the follow-up assessment, F (1, 59) = 28.840, p = 0.774, partial η2 = 0.001.
ITS: Inappropriate Touch Scale
An evident interaction between groups and time was found for ITS [F (2, 164) = 230.136, p < 0.001, partial η2 = 0.737]. There was a clear difference in mean ITS score across the various time intervals, F (1, 164) = 1223.487, p < 0.001, partial η2 = 0.882. Notably, group membership also exhibited a significant impact on mean ITS scores, F (2, 164) = 6.294, p = 0.002, partial η2 = 0.071.
Regarding the simple effects of group (Table 1), children’s knowledge did not show a significant difference at time 1 (pre-test), F (2, 164) = 0.519, p = 0.596, partial η2 = 0.006. However, after the intervention, there was a significant difference at time 2 (post-test), F (2, 164) = 19.726, p < 0.001, partial η2 = 0.194.
Multiple comparisons (Table 2) revealed that group 1 demonstrated a notably higher ITS score (p = 0.003) in contrast to the control group (group 3). Likewise, group 2 exhibited a substantial increase in the ITS score (p < 0.001) compared to group 3. Additionally, there was a significant distinction in the ITS score between group 1 and group 2 (p = 0.016).
With regard to the simple effects of time (Table 1), in the child-only group (group 1), ITS scores notably increased from the initial assessment to the subsequent evaluation, F (1, 53) = 520.418, p < 0.001, partial η2 = 0.760. Similarly, the child and parent group (group 2) demonstrated significant enhancements in their ITS scores from the initial assessment to the subsequent evaluation, F (1, 52) = 1070.755, p < 0.001, partial η2 = 0.867. Although there was no intervention in group 3, ITS scores in group 3 significantly improved from the initial assessment to post-test (M = 11.117, SE = 0.452), F (1, 59) = 17.049, p < 0.001, partial η2 = 0.094.
Discussion
The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy of the Doll Program in enhancing knowledge of sexual abuse prevention among early-grade elementary school children. We recruited 181 students from Beijing elementary schools, randomly assigning them to one of three groups: 1) child only, 2) child and parent, or 3) control group. The Children’s Knowledge of Abuse Questionnaire was utilized to examine pre-test and post-test scores on the two subscales—Appropriate Touch Scale and Inappropriate Touch Scale. The following outcomes are revealed in the data discussed below in relation to the hypothesized questions.
Addressing Hypothesis 1, our results indicate that involvement in the Doll program substantially improved awareness of child sexual abuse prevention, particularly in recognizing inappropriate touching. This signifies a notable advancement in child-specific knowledge.
All three groups exhibited similar levels of knowledge regarding appropriate and inappropriate touch before any intervention. The scores on the Appropriate Touch Subscale at pre-test (p = 0.977) and the Inappropriate Touch Subscale (p = 0.596) showed no significant differences among the three groups.
Both group 1 (p = 0.001) and group 2 (p < 0.001) students significantly increased their ATS scores at post-test compared to pre-test. While there were no statistically meaningful distinctions among the three groups at time 2, the control group’s ATS scores did not exhibit a significant increase from pre-test to post-test (p = 0.774). It indicates that students in the intervention groups gained more knowledge about appropriate touch than before, albeit to a lesser extent.
Regarding the Inappropriate Touch Subscale, group 1 and group 2 both demonstrated a significant difference in scores between the pre-test and post-test (p < 0.001), while group 3 did not exhibit this difference. Furthermore, in multiple comparisons, the understanding of inappropriate touch was significantly higher in both group 1 and group 2 than in the control group (p = 0.003, p < 0.001). Overall, the participation in the Doll program significantly enhanced children’s grasp of CSA prevention knowledge, particularly regarding inappropriate touching. These outcomes align with prior studies that assessed CSA programs using the CKAQ-RIII [16, 45, 46].
Regarding Hypothesis 2, parental involvement appears to positively impact the understanding of inappropriate touching, as indicated by the significant difference in ITS scores (p = 0.016) between group 1 (child only) and group 2 (child and parent) at post-test. It is suggested that the inclusion of parents in the Doll program may have motivated children to explore more scenarios related to sexual abuse. Further research is necessary to delineate the specific positive roles played by parents in the Doll program.
Finally, the results reveal that while the control group showed no significant change in Appropriate Touch Scale scores, there was a notable increase in Inappropriate Touch Scale scores between pre-test and post-test (p < 0.001). This suggests a significant improvement in the control group’s awareness of inappropriate touching over time. One plausible explanation is that the pre-test acted as a motivator for some children to seek correct answers, leading to an enhanced understanding through discussions or increased attention to the subject matter. Another plausible explanation is that these children may have been exposed to related information through other curricular aspects. These findings are consistent with Tutty’s research, where children who had not participated in a prevention program still displayed noteworthy shifts in knowledge over a 5-month period, encompassing both aspects of touch appropriateness and inappropriateness [42]. Comparable outcomes were also noted in another study conducted by Tutty and in the implementation of the HOOC program for preventing CSA [41, 45].
Limitations
First, it is crucial to highlight that our study solely involved the measurement of two data sets: the pre-test and post-test (5 weeks), demonstrating the Doll’s effectiveness in increasing children’s knowledge of sexual abuse prevention. However, it is noteworthy that our study did not delve into the long-term knowledge retention within the program, a dimension commonly scrutinized in other evaluation studies [17, 45, 51]. Hence, it is imperative to complement the Doll program with a follow-up evaluation.
Additionally, it is essential to refrain from assuming a direct link between improved knowledge, evaluated through the CKAQ-RIII, and subsequent behavioral changes leading to a reduction in the risk of CSA for participants [4, 46, 52, 53]. While there is a common assumption that increased knowledge and skills correspond to behavioral changes in real-life scenarios [54], evidence supporting the preventive impact of knowledge acquisition on sexual abuse is lacking [55]. The effectiveness of the Doll prevention program in reducing future instances of sexual abuse remains uncertain, necessitating additional research.
Furthermore, Sexual abuse prevention programs have faced scrutiny over the balance between program benefits and potential drawbacks, including inducing anxiety or impeding cooperation and trust in adults [56]. Hence, in addition to emphasizing the positive outcomes of CSA prevention programs, numerous studies have scrutinized potential negative effects. These evaluations encompass possible detrimental consequences such as anxiety, touch aversion, fear, mistrust of people, etc. [17, 47], [57–59], and found that the majority of children are not adversely affected by exposure to CSA prevention programs. Instead, children experienced an increase in knowledge of sexual abuse prevention [17, 58], a decrease in self-blame for sexual abuse [60], a rise in the disclosure of sexual abuse incidents [61], an improvement in parent-child communication [62], and no increase in sexual problems [63]. Our current study does not evaluate potential negative impacts of the Doll program. Subsequent studies will encompass a broader range of children to evaluate the program’s appropriateness.
Finally, while parents participated in our study, the Doll program’s main focus lies in fostering children’s awareness of sexual abuse prevention rather than delivering explicit instructions to parents. Critics argue that child-directed CSA programs place the prevention responsibility on victims [4], but it’s crucial to recognize their positive impact in enhancing children’s knowledge for self-protection. Simultaneously, there’s a moral duty to equip children with tools for effective action against sexual abuse [56]. However, Child-focused CSA programs are just one part of a CSA prevention. Preventing child sexual abuse requires not only educating and empowering children but also engaging parents, teachers, social workers and other stakeholders to participate in prevention programs [64–66]. In future studies, we need to iterate on the Doll program, involving other stakeholders such as parents and teachers, to ensure a more comprehensive impact.
Conclusion
Despite these limitations, the findings carry significant implications. They suggest that the Doll program effectively enhances participants’ CSA knowledge, highlighting the efficacy of the e-educational toolkit in achieving substantial knowledge gains. This improvement could potentially lead to increased adoption of CSA prevention skills, ultimately contributing to lower rates of CSA—a crucial area for future research. The cost-effective implementation of the e-educational toolkit in the Doll program makes it particularly suitable for environments with limited educational resources, which provides valuable insights into preventing child sexual abuse in countries with conservative sexual education contexts and scarce resources, such as China. Additionally, the findings shed light on the impact of parental engagement on learning. Future research should focus on enhancing the Doll program, iterating the e-toolkit to involve a broader range of stakeholders, including parents and teachers, and providing training.
Ethics Statement
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Institutional Review Board (IRB) at Beijing Institute of Technology (BIT-EC-H-2023097) and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Author Contributions
KX: first author. KX, JF: collection. JY: senior advisor. JF: advisor, corrections. JF: last and corresponding author. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they do not have any conflicts of interest.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank all participants for their cooperation in the data collection.
References
1. Barth, J, Bermetz, L, Heim, E, Trelle, S, and Tonia, T. The Current Prevalence of Child Sexual Abuse Worldwide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Int J Public Health (2013) 58(3):469–83. doi:10.1007/s00038-012-0426-1
2. Wurtele, SK. Preventing Sexual Abuse of Children in the Twenty-First Century: Preparing for Challenges and Opportunities. J Child Sex Abuse (2009) 18(1):1–18. doi:10.1080/10538710802584650
3. Stoltenborgh, M, van Ijzendoorn, MH, Euser, EM, and Bakermans-Kranenburg, MJ. A Global Perspective on Child Sexual Abuse: Meta-Analysis of Prevalence Around the World. Child Maltreat (2011) 16(2):79–101. doi:10.1177/1077559511403920
4. Collin-Vézina, D, Daigneault, I, and Hébert, M. Lessons Learned From Child Sexual Abuse Research: Prevalence, Outcomes, and Preventive Strategies. Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health (2013) 7(1):22. doi:10.1186/1753-2000-7-22
5. Okamura, A, Heras, P, and Wong-Kerberg, L. Sexual Abuse in Nine North American Cultures: Treatment and Prevention. In: Sexual Abuse in Nine North American Cultures: Treatment and Prevention. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc. (1995). p. 67–96. doi:10.4135/9781452243337
6. Tang, CS. Childhood Experience of Sexual Abuse Among Hong Kong Chinese College Students. Child Abuse Neglect (2002) 26(1):23–37. doi:10.1016/S0145-2134(01)00306-4
7. Lyu, Y, Chow, JC-C, and Hwang, J-J. Exploring Public Attitudes of Child Abuse in Mainland China: A Sentiment Analysis of China’s Social Media Weibo. Child Youth Serv Rev (2020) 116:105250. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105250
8. Tang, CS, and Lee, YK. Knowledge on Sexual Abuse and Self-Protection Skills: A Study on Female Chinese Adolescents With Mild Mental Retardation. Child Abuse Neglect (1999) 23(3):269–79. doi:10.1016/S0145-2134(98)00124-0
9. Lu, M, Barlow, J, Meinck, F, Walsh, K, and Wu, Y. School-Based Child Sexual Abuse Interventions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Res Soc Work Pract (2023) 33(4):390–412. doi:10.1177/10497315221111393
10. Chen, Y-C, Fortson, BL, and Tseng, K-W. Pilot Evaluation of a Sexual Abuse Prevention Program for Taiwanese Children. J Child Sex Abuse (2012) 21(6):621–45. doi:10.1080/10538712.2012.726699
11. Jin, Y, Chen, J, Jiang, Y, and Yu, B. Evaluation of a Sexual Abuse Prevention Education Program for School-Age Children in China: A Comparison of Teachers and Parents as Instructors. Health Edu Res (2017) 32(4):364–73. doi:10.1093/her/cyx047
12. Urbann, K, Bienstein, P, and Kaul, T. The Evidence-Based Sexual Abuse Prevention Program: Strong With Sam. J Deaf Stud Deaf Edu (2020) 25(4):421–9. doi:10.1093/deafed/enaa019
13. Cecen-Erogul, A, and Hasirci, OK. The Effectiveness of Psycho-Educational School-Based Child Sexual Abuse Prevention Training Program on Turkish Elementary Students. Kuram Ve Uygulamada Egitim Bilimleri (2013) 13(2):725–729. Available: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/The-Effectiveness-of-Psycho-Educational-Child-Abuse-Cecen-Erogul-Hasirci/edd5686b4ec773d62c53c8dad3d5ddc6b15fd147 (Accessed September 13, 2023).
14. Martin, J, Riazi, H, Firoozi, A, and Nasiri, M. A Sex Education Program for Teachers of Preschool Children: A Quasi-Experimental Study in Iran. BMC Public Health (2020) 20(1):692. doi:10.1186/s12889-020-08826-y
15. McElearney, A, Brennan-Wilson, A, Murphy, C, Stephenson, P, and Bunting, B. Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial of ‘Whole School’ Child Maltreatment Prevention Programme in Primary Schools in Northern Ireland: Study Protocol for Keeping Safe. BMC Public Health (2018) 18(1):590. doi:10.1186/s12889-018-5492-8
16. Jones, C, Scholes, L, Rolfe, B, and Stieler-Hunt, C. A Serious-Game for Child Sexual Abuse Prevention: An Evaluation of Orbit. Child Abuse Neglect (2020) 107:104569. doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2020.104569
17. Czerwinski, F, Finne, E, Alfes, J, and Kolip, P. Effectiveness of a School-Based Intervention to Prevent Child Sexual Abuse—Evaluation of the German IGEL Program. Child Abuse Neglect (2018) 86:109–22. doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2018.08.023
18. Song, Y. The Sexuality Education and Attitudes of College Students in China. Health Edu (2015) 115(1):93–104. doi:10.1108/HE-01-2014-0002
19. Huang, S, and Cui, C. Preventing Child Sexual Abuse Using Picture Books: The Effect of Book Character and Message Framing. J Child Sex Abuse (2020) 29(4):448–67. doi:10.1080/10538712.2020.1719449
20. Wu, Y, Chen, J, and Guo, S. Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practice of Child Sexual Abuse Prevention Among Primary School Teachers: A Study in a City of Guangdong Province of China. J Child Sex Abuse (2021) 30(8):994–1005. doi:10.1080/10538712.2021.1985675
21. Sherr, L, Mebrahtu, H, Mwaba, K, Nurova, N, Chetty, AN, Swartz, A, et al. ‘Tipping the Balance’ – An Evaluation of COVID-19 Parenting Resources Developed and Adapted for Child Protection During Global Emergency Responses. Health Psychol Behav Med (2022) 10(1):676–94. doi:10.1080/21642850.2022.2104285
22. Sanders, MR, Divan, G, Singhal, M, Turner, KMT, Velleman, R, Michelson, D, et al. Scaling Up Parenting Interventions Is Critical for Attaining the Sustainable Development Goals. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev (2022) 53(5):941–52. doi:10.1007/s10578-021-01171-0
23. Schafer, M, Lachman, JM, Gardner, F, Zinser, P, Calderon, F, Han, Q, et al. Integrating Intimate Partner Violence Prevention Content Into a Digital Parenting Chatbot Intervention During COVID-19: Intervention Development and Remote Data Collection. BMC Public Health (2023) 23(1):1708. doi:10.1186/s12889-023-16649-w
24. Arnab, S, Brown, K, Clarke, S, Dunwell, I, Lim, T, Suttie, N, et al. The Development Approach of a Pedagogically-Driven Serious Game to Support Relationship and Sex Education (RSE) Within a Classroom Setting. Comput Edu (2013) 69:15–30. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.06.013
25. Chan, SL, and Jaafar, A. Usage-Centered Design Approach in Design of Malaysia Sexuality Education (MSE) Courseware. In: Visual Informatics: Bridging Research and Practice. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer (2009). p. 856–67. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-05036-7_81
26. Jones, CM, and Pozzebon, K. Being Safety Smart: Social Issue Game for Child Protective Behaviour Training. In: Presented at the Proceedings of HCI 2010. Dundee, United kingdom: BCS Learning & Development (2010). Available: https://www.scienceopen.com/hosted-document?doi=10.14236/ewic/HCI2010.20 (Accessed May 10, 2023).
27. Muller, AR, Roder, M, and Fingerle, M. Child Sexual Abuse Prevention Goes Online: Introducing ‘Cool and Safe’ and its Effects. Comput Edu (2014) 78:60–5. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.04.023
28. Pritha, ST, Tasnim, R, Kabir, MA, Amin, S, and Das, A. Smartphone Apps for Child Sexual Abuse Education: Gaps and Design Considerations. IJMLO (2023) 1(1):1. doi:10.1504/IJMLO.2023.10049097
29. Endendijk, JJ, Tichelaar, HK, Deen, M, and Deković, M. Vil Du?! Incorporation of a Serious Game in Therapy for Sexually Abused Children and Adolescents. Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health (2021) 15(1):25. doi:10.1186/s13034-021-00377-3
30. UNESCO. Revised Edition of the International Technical Guidance on Sexuality Education. Paris: UNESCO (2018). Available at: http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0026/002607/260770e.pdf (Accessed January 14, 2024).
31. Ji, Y, and Reiss, MJ. Cherish Lives? Progress and Compromise in Sexuality Education Textbooks Produced in Contemporary China. Sex Edu (2022) 22(4):496–519. doi:10.1080/14681811.2021.1955670
32. Liu, W. Cherishing Life - Sexuality Education for Primary School Students (5 Grade I). Beijing: Beijing Normal University Publishing Group (2017).
33. Sanders, EB-N, and Stappers, PJ. Co-Creation and the New Landscapes of Design. CoDesign (2008) 4(1):5–18. doi:10.1080/15710880701875068
34. Ramos-Vega, MC, Palma-Morales, VM, Pérez-Marín, D, and Moguerza, JM. Stimulating Children’s Engagement With an Educational Serious Videogame Using Lean UX Co-Design. Entertainment Comput (2021) 38:100405. doi:10.1016/j.entcom.2021.100405
35. Hussain, S, and Sanders, EB-N. Fusion of Horizons: Co-Designing With Cambodian Children Who Have Prosthetic Legs, Using Generative Design Tools. CoDesign (2012) 8(1):43–79. doi:10.1080/15710882.2011.637113
36. Mencarini, E, Leonardi, C, Cappelletti, A, Giovanelli, D, De Angeli, A, and Zancanaro, M. Co-Designing Wearable Devices for Sports: The Case Study of Sport Climbing. Int J Human-Computer Stud (2019) 124:26–43. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2018.10.005
37. Babatsikos, G. Parents’ Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices About Preventing Child Sexual Abuse: A Literature Review. Child Abuse Rev (2010) 19(2):107–29. doi:10.1002/car.1102
38. Wurtele, S, Gillispie, E, Decker, L, and Franklin, C. A Comparison of Teachers vs. Parents as Instructors of a Personal Safety Program for Preschoolers. Child Abuse Neglect (1992) 16:127–37. doi:10.1016/0145-2134(92)90013-H
39. Xu, W, and Cheung, M. Parental Engagement in Child Sexual Abuse Prevention Education in Hong Kong. Health Edu Res (2023) 82(4):376–89. doi:10.1177/00178969231159968
40. Tutty, LM. What Children Learn From Sexual Abuse Prevention Programs: Difficult Concepts and Developmental Issues. Res Soc Work Pract (2000) 10(3):275–300. doi:10.1177/104973150001000301
41. Tutty, LM. Child Sexual Abuse Prevention Programs: Evaluating Who Do You Tell. Child Abuse Neglect (1997) 21(9):869–81. doi:10.1016/S0145-2134(97)00048-3
42. Tutty, LM. The Ability of Elementary School Children to Learn Child Sexual Abuse Prevention Concepts. Child Abuse Neglect (1992) 16(3):369–84. doi:10.1016/0145-2134(92)90046-T
43. Tutty, L. The Revised Children’s Knowledge of Abuse Questionnaire: Development of a Measure of Children’s Understanding of Sexual Abuse Prevention Concepts. Soc Work Res (1995) 19:112–20. doi:10.1093/swr/19.2.112
44. Daigneault, I, Hébert, M, McDuff, P, and Frappier, J-Y. Evaluation of a Sexual Abuse Prevention Workshop in a Multicultural, Impoverished Urban Area. J Child Sex Abuse (2012) 21(5):521–42. doi:10.1080/10538712.2012.703291
45. Dunn, M. The Learning of Sexual Abuse Prevention Concepts and the Reliability of the Ckaq-Riii in the South African Context. Social Work (2011) 47(2):155–75. doi:10.15270/47-2-133
46. Gangos, CJ, Nega, C, and Apergi, F-S. Adaptation and Psychometric Evaluation of the Children’s Knowledge of Abuse Questionnaire (CKAQ-RIII) in Greek Elementary School Children. J Child Sex Abuse (2019) 28(2):222–39. doi:10.1080/10538712.2018.1538175
47. Hébert, M, Lavoie, F, Piché, C, and Poitras, M. Proximate Effects of a Child Sexual Abuse Prevention Program in Elementary School Children. Child Abuse Neglect (2001) 25(4):505–22. doi:10.1016/S0145-2134(01)00223-X
48. Weir, KM. An Exploratory Study of Pre-Schooler’s Perceptions and Understanding of Concepts Taught in the ‘Feeling Special, Feeling Safe’ Sexual Abuse Prevention Program: A Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts in Psychology at Massey University. New Zealand: Massey University (1999). Thesis, Available: https://mro.massey.ac.nz/handle/10179/6745 (Accessed September 13, 2023).
49. del Campo Sánchez, A, and López Sánchez, F. Evaluation of School-Based Child Sexual Abuse Prevention Program. Psicothema (2006) 18:1–8. Spanish.
50. Jin, Y, Chen, J, and Yu, B. Knowledge and Skills of Sexual Abuse Prevention: A Study on School-Aged Children in Beijing, China. J Child Sex Abuse (2016) 25(6):686–96. doi:10.1080/10538712.2016.1199079
51. Hazzard, A, Webb, C, Kleemeier, C, Angert, L, and Pohl, J. Child Sexual Abuse Prevention: Evaluation and One-Year Follow-Up. Child Abuse Neglect (1991) 15(1):123–38. doi:10.1016/0145-2134(91)90097-W
52. Zhang, W, Chen, J, Feng, Y, Li, J, Liu, C, and Zhao, X. Evaluation of a Sexual Abuse Prevention Education for Chinese Preschoolers. Res Soc Work Pract (2014) 24(4):428–36. doi:10.1177/1049731513510409
53. Anderson, LA, and Whiston, SC. Sexual Assault Education Programs: A Meta-Analytic Examination of Their Effectiveness. Psychol Women Q (2005) 29(4):374–88. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2005.00237.x
54. Fryda, CM, and Hulme, PA. School-Based Childhood Sexual Abuse Prevention Programs: An Integrative Review. J Sch Nurs (2015) 31(3):167–82. doi:10.1177/1059840514544125
55. Topping, KJ, and Barron, IG. School-Based Child Sexual Abuse Prevention Programs: A Review of Effectiveness. Rev Educ Res (2009) 79(1):431–63. doi:10.3102/0034654308325582
56. Finkelhor, D. The Prevention of Childhood Sexual Abuse. Future Child (2009) 19(2):169–94. doi:10.1353/foc.0.0035
57. Casper, R. Characteristics of Children Who Experience Positive or Negative Reactions to a Sexual Abuse Prevention Program. J Child Sex Abuse (1999) 7(4):97–112. doi:10.1300/J070v07n04_07
58. Lee, YK, and Tang, CS. Evaluation of a Sexual Abuse Prevention Program for Female Chinese Adolescents With Mild Mental Retardation. Am J Ment Retard (1998) 103(2):105. doi:10.1352/0895-8017(1998)103<0105:EOASAP>2.0.CO;2
59. Wurtele, SK, and Miller-Perrin, CL. An Evaluation of Side Effects Associated With Participation in a Child Sexual Abuse Prevention Program. J Sch Health (1987) 57(6):228–31. doi:10.1111/j.1746-1561.1987.tb07838.x
60. Finkelhor, D, Asdigian, N, and Dziuba-Leatherman, J. Victimization Prevention Programs for Children: A Follow-Up. Am J Public Health (1995) 85(12):1684–9. doi:10.2105/AJPH.85.12.1684
61. Walsh, K, Zwi, K, Woolfenden, S, and Shlonsky, A. School-Based Education Programmes for the Prevention of Child Sexual Abuse. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2015) 2015(4):CD004380. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD004380.pub3
62. Finkelhor, D, Asdigian, N, and Dziuba-Leatherman, J. The Effectiveness of Victimization Prevention Instruction: An Evaluation of Children’s Responses to Actual Threats and Assaults. Child Abuse Neglect (1995) 19(2):141–53. doi:10.1016/0145-2134(94)00112-8
63. Gibson, LE, and Leitenberg, H. Child Sexual Abuse Prevention Programs: Do They Decrease the Occurrence of Child Sexual Abuse? Child Abuse Neglect (2000) 24(9):1115–25. doi:10.1016/S0145-2134(00)00179-4
64. Margolin, L, Wurtele, SK, and Miller-Perrin, CL. Preventing Child Sexual Abuse: Sharing the Responsibility. Fam Relations (1993) 42:109–10. doi:10.2307/584937
65. Wurtele, SK. Preventing the Sexual Exploitation of Minors in Youth-Serving Organizations. Child Youth Serv Rev (2012) 34(12):2442–53. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2012.09.009
Keywords: child sexual abuse, CKAQ-RIII, intervention, evaluation, prevention
Citation: Xu K, Fu J and Yang J (2024) Enhancing Child Sexual Abuse Prevention Knowledge With an Educational Toolkit -Evaluation of the Chinese Doll Program. Int J Public Health 69:1606641. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2024.1606641
Received: 18 September 2023; Accepted: 09 January 2024;
Published: 22 January 2024.
Edited by:
Nino Kuenzli, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute (Swiss TPH), SwitzerlandReviewed by:
One reviewer who chose to remain anonymousCopyright © 2024 Xu, Fu and Yang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Jiuqiang Fu, ZnVqcTAzMDZAMTI2LmNvbQ==