Skip to main content

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Int J Public Health, 16 January 2023

Global Epidemiological Patterns in the Burden of Main Non-Communicable Diseases, 1990–2019: Relationships With Socio-Demographic Index

Jianjun Bai&#x;Jianjun Bai1Jiaxin Cui&#x;Jiaxin Cui2Fang ShiFang Shi1Chuanhua Yu
Chuanhua Yu1*
  • 1School of Public Health, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
  • 2School of Nursing, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China

Objectives: This study aimed to analyze spatio-temporal patterns of the global burden caused by main NCDs along the socio-economic development.

Methods: We extracted relevant data from GBD 2019. The estimated annual percentage changes, quantile regression and limited cubic splines were adopted to estimate temporal trends and relationships with socio-demographic index.

Results: NCDs accounted for 74.36% of global all-cause deaths in 2019. The main NCDs diseases were estimated for cardiovascular diseases, neoplasms, and chronic respiratory diseases, with deaths of 18.56 (17.08–19.72) million, 10.08 (9.41–10.66) million and 3.97 (3.58–4.30) million, respectively. The death burden of three diseases gradually decreased globally over time. Regional and sex variations existed worldwide. Besides, the death burden of CVD showed the inverted U-shaped associations with SDI, while neoplasms were positively correlated with SDI, and CRD showed the negative association.

Conclusion: NCDs remain a crucial public health issue worldwide, though several favorable trends of CVD, neoplasms and CRD were observed. Regional and sex disparities still existed. Public health managers should execute more targeted programs to lessen NCDs burden, predominantly among lower SDI countries.

Introduction

Over the last 3 decades, the global health landscape has undergone tremendous transformation along with economic expansion, population swell, aging, greater longevity, unhealthy lifestyle and environmental pollution, which collectively lead to marked changes in the pattern of disease burden [1, 2]. Epidemiologic evidence suggests that non-communicable diseases (NCDs) have been the main contributors to the mortality and disability adjusted life years (DALY) worldwide [3, 4]. Meanwhile, these NCDs are no longer diseases of affluence, but affect all countries at different socio-economic levels [5].

The underlying reasons for this transformation may be the population aging and the rapid decline in deaths from communicable, maternal, neonatal, and nutritional causes (CMNN) [3]. During the past decades, many programs, like Millennium Development Goals (MDG), have significantly reduced the deaths from CMNN, including lower respiratory infections, measles, neonatal disorders, tuberculosis and so on [6, 7]. According to GBD 2017, CMNN accounted for 18.6% of global deaths, with the number of CMNN deaths decreasing by 22.2% and mortality decreasing by 31.8% since 2007. Whereas NCDs have already made up the most important part, accounting for 73.4% of global deaths. Deaths from NCDs increased worldwide, from 33.5 million in 2007 to 41.1 million in 2017. The most enormous numbers of deaths from NCDs were estimated for cardiovascular diseases (CVD, 17.8 million), followed by neoplasms (9.56 million) and chronic respiratory diseases (CRD, 3.91 million) [8]. Population aging and growth may amplify the speed of this shift from CMNN to NCDs [9].

NCDs are not just one of the most pressing global health concerns, but also a significant development challenge and human rights issue [3]. Given this apparent shift and the increasing NCD burden worldwide, the United Nations released the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) target 3.4 to reduce the premature mortality from NCDs by a third by 2030 from several aspects, such as poverty, economic growth, education, and gender disparity [10]. Meanwhile, many developing countries, like Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa, also affirmed to make efforts to achieve the SDGs 2030 [11]. Hence, to judge the gap between current conditions and SDGs, it is essential to explore the spatial distribution disparities of the burden caused by main NCDs, and evaluate the secular trends over the recent period on a global scale, especially among countries or regions with different social-economic levels.

In this study, we analyzed the spatio-temporal patterns of the burden caused by CVD, neoplasms, and CRD at national, regional, and global scales and assessed the association between socio-demographic index (SDI) and burden of disease.

Methods

Data Sources

The Global Burden of Diseases (GBD) 2019 provided a systematic and comprehensive annual assessment of 369 diseases and injuries, 87 behavioral, environmental, occupational, and metabolic risk factors among 204 countries or territories, and 21 GBD regions over the past 30 years. Detailed information can be found in the Global Health Data Exchange (GHDx) query tool (http://ghdx.healthdata.org/gbd-results-tool). As a secondary study, we extracted data on annual deaths, DALYs, mortality, DALY rates, age standardized mortality rates (ASMRs) and age standardized DALY rates (ASDRs) for CVD, neoplasms, and CRD from 1990 to 2019. The SDI is used to evaluate the social development level comprehensively. It is a composite indicator of income per capita, average education for those aged 15 and older, and total fertility rate under 25, ranging from 0 to 1, i.e., least to most developed ones [12]. Based on SDI, the 204 countries and territories are divided into five regions: low (less than 0.46), low-middle (0.46–0.60), middle (0.61–0.69), high-middle (0.70–0.81), and high (greater than 0.81) SDI regions.

The detailed methodology of GBD 2019 has been described previously [13, 14]. We have provided the ICD-10 codes for CVD, neoplasms and CRD in Supplementary Table S1. Briefly, 86,249 sources were included in GBD 2019 analysis, including censuses, household surveys, civil registration and vital statistics, disease registries, systematic literature search and so on. To ensure comparability of multiple data sources, the GBD utilized standardized data identification, extraction, and processing methods to address data incompleteness, discrepancies in coding practices, and inconsistent sex and age group reports [15]. A standard cause of death ensemble model (CODEm) and DisMod-MR2.1 synthesized all available data sources to produce internally consistent mortality and prevalence estimates. Years of life lost (YLLs) were calculated by using global standard life expectancy and death counts by age based on the GBD 2019 reference life table [13, 16]. Years lived with disability (YLDs) were determined by multiplying sequela-specific prevalence by the corresponding disability weights. DALYs were the sum of YLLs and YLDs. And GBD generated 95% uncertainty intervals (UI) for all reported data based on the 25th and 975th ordered values of 1,000 draws of the posterior distribution [17].

Statistical Analysis

We used the age standardized rates (ASRs) and estimated annual percentage change (EAPC) to quantify the trends of disease burden. ASRs were required when comparing several different populations or the same population across time with different age structures. Besides, the ASR trends could serve as good proxies to evaluate the transformation of disease patterns and the efficacy of current preventative initiatives.

ASR=i=1Aaiwii=1Awi

where ai was the age-specific rate of ith age group, wi was the number of persons in the same ith age group of the reference standard population. ASRs were based on the GBD 2019 global standard population.

The EAPC has been widely used in previous studies [1820], reflecting the trend of ASRs over time. A regression line was fitted to the natural logarithm of the ASRs:

lnASR=a+bx+e
x=calendaryear
EAPC=100*expb1

EAPCs and its 95% confidence interval (CI) can be obtained from the linear regression model. If the estimated EAPC and the lower bound of its 95% CI were both >0, then ASR was considered to show the upward trend; if both the estimated EAPC and the upper bound of its 95% CI were <0, then ASR was on the downward trend; otherwise, ASR was considered to be stable.

We also applied the restricted cubic splines (RCS) with the lowest Akaike information criterion to explore the relationship between SDI and ASMRs, ASDRs, gender differences of ASRs (males’-females’), YLD-YLL ratios, EAPCs. The YLD-YLL ratios were calculated by dividing the age standardized YLD rate by the age standardized YLL rate to reflect the change in YLDs proportion. RCS is essentially the regression splines with added constraints. The regression spline is a piecewise polynomial in which each piece must have a continuous and second-order derivative. Regression splines are required for restricted cubic splines: the spline function is a linear function at the extreme ends of the independent variable data range [21].

Quantile regression (QR) was further applied to determine whether the influence of SDI on target disease burden varied across different quantiles. The change in disease burden due to SDI in specific percentiles has depicted in Supplementary Table S2. QR estimates the linear relationship between the different quantiles of the dependent and independent variables and attempts to comprehensively present all data information, which is an advantage over the traditional linear regression model [21]. The estimation of QR is based on the minimum weighted absolute value residual [22]. The minimum weighted absolute deviation of quantile regression is as follows:

minwtytα=i:yi<αT1τytα+i:yiαTτytα

ArcGIS (10.5) was used for mapping to reflect the geographic variability of the target disease burden. Statistical analyses were performed using Python software (3.7) and R software (4.0.2). Two-sided p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Transmission of Disease Burden and SDI

The global number of deaths from NCDs was 42.03 million (95% UI 40.08–43.94) in 2019, which accounted for 74.36% of all-cause deaths. The most enormous numbers of deaths were estimated for cardiovascular diseases (18.56 million [17.08–19.72]), followed by neoplasms (10.08 million [9.41–10.66]) and chronic respiratory diseases (3.97 million [3.58–4.30]). Among 204 countries or territories, the highest SDI was observed in Switzerland (0.929), followed by Norway (0.913) and Monaco (0.902). The SDI of Niger (0.162), Chad (0.238), and Burkina Faso (0.257) were the lowest. For 21 GBD regions, the SDI in High-income Asia Pacific (0.873) was the highest, followed by High-income North America (0.860) and Western Europe (0.843) (Supplementary Figure S1). Compared with the SDI in 1990, the countries with obvious increases in SDI were mainly concentrated in Africa, like Equatorial Guinea (229.33%), Mozambique (155.83%), and Uganda (141.92%) (Supplementary Figure S1).

Disease Burden Due to Cardiovascular Diseases

According to GBD 2019, the ASMRs of CVD varied considerably across the world (Figure 1). Four of six countries with ASMRs below 100 per 100,000 were high SDI countries (Japan, South Korea, Singapore, and France). And the fastest decrease in ASMR has been seen in South Korea, with the EAPC of −5.19 (95% CI −5.39 to −4.98) (Supplementary Figure S2). The ASDRs of CVD were significantly heterogeneous globally, with the highest ASDR observed in the Solomon Islands (20,181.50; 16,678.86–23,957.75) and the lowest in Japan (1,620.47; 1,460.11–1744.70) (Figure 1). Besides, 14 of 16 countries with ASDRs exceeding 10,000 per 100,000 were from low, low-middle, and middle SDI regions.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 1. Age standardized mortality rates (A) and age standardized Disability adjusted life years rates (B) per 100,000 people of cardiovascular diseases, neoplasms and chronic respiratory diseases. Global Burden of Diseases Study, 204 countries or territories, 2019.

Table 1 showed ASMRs and ASDRs of CVD in 1990 and 2019 and corresponding temporal trends. The ASMR and ASDR decreased across the world and all five SDI regions from 1990 to 2019. The most rapid declines for both ASMR and ASDR were detected in the high SDI region, with EAPCs of −2.86 (95% CI −3.00 to −2.72) and −2.63 (−2.77 to −2.49), respectively. While in recent years, the declines have stagnated in the high SDI region (Supplementary Figure S3). Among 21 geographical regions, the most significant decrease in ASMR was observed in High-income Asia Pacific (EAPC = −3.54, −3.73 to −3.35), followed by Australasia and Western Europe. Meanwhile, the most rapid decrease in ASDR was detected in Australasia (EAPC = −3.56, −3.76 to −3.35), followed by High-income Asia Pacific and Western Europe. All these were from high SDI region.

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

TABLE 1. The age standardized mortality rate (A) and age standardized Disability adjusted life years rate (B) and corresponding temporal trends of cardiovascular diseases. Global Burden of Diseases Study, 21 Global Burden of Diseases regions, 1990–2019.

The estimated association between SDI and ASRs due to CVD were showed as the blue line in Figure 2. Based on the restricted cubic spline, the trends in ASMR and ASDR were increasing first and then decreasing, with inflection points of 0.55 and 0.52, respectively. The overall positive association were observed between SDI and YLD-YLL ratio (Figure 3), suggesting that the proportion of YLD is increasing with SDI. In addition, negative correlations were detected between EAPC and SDI, which means countries with higher SDI have experienced more rapid decreases in ASRs of CVD from 1990 to 2019 (Supplementary Figure S4). Meanwhile, the relationship between the SDI and gender difference of ASMR and ASDR in CVD tended to increase and then decrease with increasing SDI to some extent, but not significantly. Moreover, the burden of CVD was more severe in males than in females, although the decreasing trends of ASMR and ASDR for CVD were observed in each gender (Supplementary Figure S5).

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 2. The correlation between the socio-demographic index with age standardized mortality rates (A) and age standardized Disability adjusted life years rates (B) of cardiovascular diseases, neoplasms and chronic respiratory diseases. Global Burden of Diseases Study, 204 countries or territories, 2019.

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 3. The correlation between the socio-demographic index and the ratios of Years lived with disability—Years of life lost for cardiovascular diseases, neoplasms and chronic respiratory diseases. Global Burden of Diseases Study, 204 countries or territories, 2019.

Disease Burden Due to Neoplasms

As shown in Figure 1, the ASMRs of neoplasms varied considerably, with the highest ASMR in Mongolia (284.33, 95% UI 229.37 to 352.46 per 100,000) and the lowest ASMR in Kuwait (71.26, 60.09–83.80). Similarly, Mongolia showed the highest ASDR (6,578.57, 5,144.24–8,338.00). The lowest ASDR was observed in Kuwait 1,583.93 (1,346.43–1,854.26). The most significant declines in both ASMR and ASDR were observed in Singapore, with EAPCs of −1.95 (−2.03 to −1.87) and −2.23 (−2.30 to −2.16), respectively (Supplementary Figure S2).

Globally, the ASMR decreased from 147.92 (141.18–153.83) to 125.41 (117.07–132.74), with an EAPC of −0.67 (95% CI −0.72 to −0.62). For SDI regions, the declining trends of ASMRs and ASDRs were relatively more obvious in high-middle and high SDI regions (Table 2). For 21 geographical regions, Oceania, Caribbean and Western Sub-Saharan Africa showed increasing trends in ASMRs. And Oceania and Western Sub-Saharan Africa showed increasing trends in ASDRs. The most rapid decreasing trends in ASMR and ASDR were observed in High-income Asia Pacific, with EAPCs of −1.08 (−1.16 to −1.00) and −1.40 (−1.48 to −1.32), respectively (Table 2).

TABLE 2
www.frontiersin.org

TABLE 2. The age standardized mortality rate (A) and age standardized Disability adjusted life years rate (B) and corresponding temporal trends of neoplasms. Global Burden of Diseases Study, 21 Global Burden of Diseases regions, 1990–2019.

The estimated association between SDI and ASRs due to neoplasms, shown as the blue line in Figure 2, was a gradual increase for ASRs as SDI increased. Meanwhile, a positive relationship was observed between SDI and YLD-YLL ratio (Figure 3). As SDI increased, YLD accounted for a progressively larger proportion of the neoplasms burden. In addition, a negative relationship was detected between EAPC and SDI (Supplementary Figure S4), which meant countries with higher SDI have experienced a more rapid decrease in ASRs of neoplasms from 1990 to 2019. The ASMR and ASDR of neoplasms showed declining trends in each gender (Table 2; Supplementary Figure S5). However, SDI was positively correlated with gender differences in burden of neoplasms, suggesting that the difference in ASRs between men and women increases with socio-demographic development (Supplementary Figure S6).

Disease Burden Due to Chronic Respiratory Diseases

Since 1990 the global ASMR of CRD has decreased, with an EAPC of −2.10 (95% CI of −2.19 to −2.00). The positive EAPC is found in Nicaragua (EAPC = 1.26; 95% CI 0.99 to 1.62), followed by Greece. The most pronounced decline was in Singapore (−5.99; −6.31 to −5.66), followed by Belarus. Also, the ASDR is on a downward trend globally, with an EAPC of −1.87 (−1.93 to −1.81). Turkmenistan showed the significant decrease in ASDR (EAPC = −4.50, −4.90 to −4.11), followed by Singapore. On the other hand, Georgia had the highest EAPC of 0.81 (0.44 to 1.18) (Supplementary Figure S2).

Over the study period, decreasing trends were observed in both ASMRs and ASDRs across five SDI regions. The most rapid decreases in ASRs were detected in high-middle and middle SDI regions (Table 3). In addition, the decline in high SDI regions has stagnated in recent years. However, during the study period, ASRs in high SDI regions remained the lowest (Supplementary Figure S3). For 21 GBD regions, except for High-income North America, all the regions showed decreasing trends in ASMRs and ASDRs. The lowest EAPC in ASMR was observed in East Asia (−4.45; −4.65 to −4.26) and Eastern Europe (−4.03; −4.37 to −3.69). The lowest EAPC in ASDR was also observed in East Asia (−4.16; −4.31 to −4.00) and Eastern Europe (−3.36; −3.65 to −3.07) (Table 3). The estimated relationship between ASRs of CRD and SDI, shown as the blue line in Figure 2, was a gradual decrease for ASRs as SDI increased. A positive relationship was observed between SDI and YLD-YLL ratio, with more rapid growth at the higher SDI levels (Figure 3). Besides, despite the decreasing trends in ASR for both males and females, males have a higher mortality rate than females. With the increase of SDI, the CRD showed the similar trends of gender differences as CVD to some extent (Supplementary Figure S6).

TABLE 3
www.frontiersin.org

TABLE 3. The age standardized mortality rate (A) and age standardized Disability adjusted life years rate (B) and corresponding temporal trends of chronic respiratory diseases. Global Burden of Diseases Study, 21 Global Burden of Diseases regions, 1990–2019.

Discussion

This study mainly analyzed the spatial and temporal patterns of the burden caused by the three major NCDs (cardiovascular diseases, neoplasms and chronic respiratory diseases), and examined the association between ASMRs, ASDRs and SDI. During the study period, the transition in disease burden from CMNN to NCDs was pronounced, with the proportion of NCDs deaths increasing from 56.75% to 74.36%. After removing the effects of population growth and aging, the ASRs showed significant declining trends globally, indicating that the prevention and control of NCDs was effective to a certain extent. However, the gaps between regions and countries were still obvious.

The transition in burden patterns would pose significant challenges to many lower SDI countries [23]. Many of these countries have been focusing on CMNN rather than the prevention or long-term care needed for NCDs [24, 25]. Evidence has indicated that low- and middle-income countries invested a large proportion of government health funds in CMNN rather than NCDs [26]. Additionally, government expenditure on health was relatively lower compared to higher-income countries [27, 28]. Before the economic and social development reaches a higher level, the coverage of some NCDs interventions may lag behind that of CMNN interventions in lower-income countries [29]. The SDI was identified as a critical factor affecting the mortality and DALY rate, which may explain regional variations to a certain extend [30]. In addition, social conditions, behavioral and metabolic risk factors (e.g., education, household income, unemployment, smoking, obesity, dietary risk, air pollution and hypertension) could also contribute to inequalities in disease burden among different SDI countries and regions [31]. According to the most recent United Nations’ report, most low- and middle-income countries are falling short of meeting SDG 3.4 for NCD mortality rate. Despite wide variations in global NCD epidemiology and health system capacity, progress in the prevention and targeting of risk factors for NCDs (e.g., tobacco, alcohol consumption, and hypertension) in some countries suggests that cross-sectoral policies on tobacco, alcohol, and unhealthy diets are relevant and necessary in all countries. In response to these risk factors, the United Nations released the “Disease Control Priorities,” which give a model list of cost-effective treatments that are realistic to execute in low- and middle-income countries and may have the potential to address a major disease burden [32].

For CVD, the ASRs of CVD in the high SDI region remained the lowest worldwide, which may be related to better access to health services, early screening, and lifesaving medications in the high SDI region [33, 34]. Whereas the ASRs of CVD in the high-middle SDI region did not match the expected value-based SDI. Our study showed that CVD in the high-middle SDI region, once the highest in the world, was still above the global level, although it has shown an obvious downward trend during the study period. Most high-middle SDI countries are developing countries, like India and China, which have experienced rapid economic and population growth in a short time. And the aging of the population is becoming more serious. Meanwhile, people in developing countries are increasingly exposed to risk factors due to globalization and urbanization [35]. Compared to GBD 1990, behavioral and metabolic factors have become the leading factors in CVD burden in the high-middle SDI region. While interventions to address these factors cannot achieve improvement in a short time [36]. Meanwhile, the absence of universal healthcare coverage, lack of access to public health education, prevention programs and primary care may be other contributors to the relatively higher burden of CVD in high-middle SDI regions [31, 35]. While these conditions would be even worse in low, low-middle and middle SDI countries.

Over time, the downward trends of ASRs due to neoplasms across all SDI regions were encouraging. However, unlike CVD and CRD, the burden of neoplasms increased to a certain extent as SDI rose. In the low SDI region, population growth was major contributor to the burden of neoplasms. In contrast, the burden of neoplasms may be mainly driven by population aging in high-middle and high SDI regions [37, 38]. Socio-economic disparities in neoplasms burden varied by neoplasms type, especially those preventable neoplasms [39, 40]. Cervical neoplasms are likely the best example, and the burden varies considerably across SDI [37]. As for preventable neoplasms, early screening and vaccination can lead to good outcomes, while socio-economic deprivations were associated with lower neoplasms screening prevalence, later-stage diagnosis, and high-risk factors [41, 42]. Additionally, previous studies showed that in many lower SDI countries, the burden of neoplasms related to infectious aetiologies and poor nutrition was declining, whereas neoplasms associated with obesity and alcohol consumption were becoming more common [8, 43]. Meanwhile, the neoplasms burden caused by unsafe sex was still severe in low and low-middle SDI regions, especially for females. This requires policymakers to formulate more targeted policies.

For chronic respiratory diseases, negative relationships between SDI and ASRs were observed. High SDI region showed the lowest burden of CRD, and the high-middle SDI region showed the most pronounced downward trend. Differences in SDI among regions caused healthcare disparities, which included poor healthcare access, inability to timely diagnose advanced lung disease, inadequate availability of advanced diagnostic modalities, and delay in referral to advanced lung disease centers. All of these ultimately led to treatment and clinical differences [44]. In addition, as a major risk factor of CRD, the smoking prevalence has decreased worldwide since 1990, but the progress in different regions was not universal [12, 14, 45]. Meanwhile, due to the lag effect and secondhand smoke, the burden of CRD contributed to smoking was still higher in low, low-middle, and middle SDI regions [46]. Additionally, exposure to air pollution has increased since 1990, especially in lower SDI regions [47].

Furthermore, to investigate the changes in YLDs proportion, the relationships between SDI and YLD-YLL ratio were examined. Similar positive relationships were observed for three diseases. We were expected to see that with increasing SDI, the proportion of YLDs in DALYs was increasing, which was consistent with the previous study [13]. Higher SDI means more access to and use of health services, broad-coverage universal health insurance, earlier screening, and more convenience to primary care, contributing to the higher proportion of YLDs compared to lower SDI regions [31, 44]. Relationships between sex and NCDs were complex. This study showed that between 1990 and 2019, the number of deaths and DALYs of three diseases for each sex tended to increase, but the age standardized mortality and age standardized DALY rates for each sex were on the decreasing trends. For CVD and CRD, the gender difference in ASRs tended to increase and then decrease with SDI, implying that the gender difference is likely to be most pronounced in countries with middle SDI. For neoplasms, gender differences of ASRs were increasing as SDI increased. What needs to pay attention to is that in some lower SDI countries, the burden of CVD and neoplasms is higher in females [48]. Females in these countries lack access to education, health-related information, and health services. Meanwhile, they often serve as caregivers for family members with NCDs and have limited autonomy and control over their health decisions, exacerbating the disease burden in females [49, 50].

GBD studies come up with comprehensive quality global disease burden estimates, yet several limitations should be noted. As a secondary study, we paid attention to the spatial and temporal patterns of disastrous burden of CVD, neoplasms and CRD and examined the association with SDI. The accuracy and robustness of GBD dataset largely depend on the quality and quantity of data used in the modelling. Civil registration and statistics systems are key sources of vital statistics for mortality rates, but the population coverage with these systems has been disappointing in some low-income regions, which may lead to underestimating the burden of disease, although GBD has conducted many adjusted methods to reduce such bias. Besides, this study mainly described the overall trends of three main NCDs, while variations in the mortality and DALY rates may partially represent the detection biases linked with the screening and diagnostic protocol’s modifications rather than factual changes in age-specific rates. Meanwhile, EAPCs were used to evaluate the changing trend for disease burden of cardiovascular diseases, neoplasms and chronic respiratory diseases over the overall period from 1990 to 2019, which might ignore the details of burden changes in some areas. Additionally, ecological fallacy might emerge since our study is based on the population level.

Conclusion

NCDs have been the main contributor to the burden of disease. CVD, neoplasms and CRD remained the major public health concern worldwide. Despite the impact of population growth and ageing, the burden of the major NCDs has improved globally. However, regional and gender disparities were observed in our study, as well as stagnation in the decline of disease burden in the high SDI region. Meanwhile, low SDI is a major impediment to progress in burden reduction in developing countries. In addition, ageing and risk exposures, including tobacco, air pollution and metabolic factors, may be the major drivers and should receive more attention and supportive policies to reduce premature deaths, mainly in low and middle SDI countries with inadequate healthcare provision.

Ethics Statement

Our study was based on a publicly available GBD database (GHDx). All data is publicly available and open access online at (http://ghdx.healthdata.org/gbd-results-tool). Therefore, ethical approval is not applicable for our study.

Author Contributions

CY conceptualized the analysis. JB and JC did the data analysis. JB wrote the first draft of the paper. JB and JC have done the revisions. JB, JC, and FS reviewed and provided comments on the first and revised draft. All authors reviewed and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

The study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number 82173626) and Health Commission of Hubei Province scientific research project (grant number WJ2019H304).

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they do not have any conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

We appreciate the works by the Global Burden of Disease study 2019 collaborators so that we could get access to the data.

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.ssph-journal.org/articles/10.3389/ijph.2023.1605502/full#supplementary-material

Abbreviations

ASDRs, age standardized DALY rates; ASMRs, age standardized mortality rates; ASRs, age standardized rates; CMNN, communicable, maternal, neonatal, and nutritional causes; CRD, chronic respiratory diseases; CVD, cardiovascular diseases; DALY, disability adjusted life years; EAPCs, estimated annual percentage changes; GBD, Global Burden of Diseases; NCDs, non-communicable diseases; QR, quantile regression; RCS, limited cubic splines; SDI, socio-demographic Index; YLDs, years lived with disability; YLLs, years of life lost.

References

1. Murray, CJ, Barber, RM, Foreman, KJ, Abbasoglu Ozgoren, A, et al. Global, Regional, and National Disability-Adjusted Life Years (DALYs) for 306 Diseases and Injuries and Healthy Life Expectancy (HALE) for 188 Countries, 1990-2013: Quantifying the Epidemiological Transition. Lancet (2015) 386(10009):2145–91. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(15)61340-X

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Omran, AR. The Epidemiologic Transition: a Theory of the Epidemiology of Population Change. Milbank Q (2005) 83(4):731–57. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0009.2005.00398.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Diem, G, Brownson, RC, Grabauskas, V, Shatchkute, A, and Stachenko, S. Prevention and Control of Noncommunicable Diseases through Evidence-Based Public Health: Implementing the NCD 2020 Action Plan. Glob Health Promot (2016) 23(3):5–13. doi:10.1177/1757975914567513

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Dalys, GBD, and Collaborators, H. Global, Regional, and National Disability-Adjusted Life-Years (DALYs) for 315 Diseases and Injuries and Healthy Life Expectancy (HALE), 1990-2015: a Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet (2016) 388(10053):1603–58. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31460-X

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5.WHO. Noncommunicable Diseases Country Profiles 2018 (2021). Available from: https://www.who.int/nmh/countries/en/ (Accessed 20212 17, 2021).

Google Scholar

6. Nugent, R, Bertram, MY, Jan, S, Niessen, LW, Sassi, F, Jamison, DT, et al. Investing in Non-communicable Disease Prevention and Management to advance the Sustainable Development Goals. Lancet (2018) 391(10134):2029–35. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30667-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Dye, C. After 2015: Infectious Diseases in a new era of Health and Development. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci (2014) 369(1645). doi:10.1098/rstb.2013.0426

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8.GBD 2017 Causes of Death Collaborators. Global, Regional, and National Age-sex-specific Mortality for 282 Causes of Death in 195 Countries and Territories, 1980-2017: a Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet (2018) 392(10159):1736–88. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(18)32203-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9.GBD 2017 Causes of Death Collaborators. Global, Regional, and National Life Expectancy, All-Cause Mortality, and Cause-specific Mortality for 249 Causes of Death, 1980-2015: a Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet (2016) 388(10053):1459–544. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(16)31012-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Strong, K, Noor, A, Aponte, J, Banerjee, A, Cibulskis, R, Diaz, T, et al. Monitoring the Status of Selected Health Related Sustainable Development Goals: Methods and Projections to 2030. Glob Health Action (2020) 13(1):1846903. doi:10.1080/16549716.2020.1846903

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. McBride, B, Hawkes, S, and Buse, K. Soft Power and Global Health: the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) Era Health Agendas of the G7, G20 and BRICS. BMC Public Health (2019) 19(1):815. doi:10.1186/s12889-019-7114-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12.GBD 2019 Risk Factors Collaborators. Global burden of 87 Risk Factors in 204 Countries and Territories, 1990-2019: a Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet (2020) 396(10258):1223–49. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30752-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13.GBD 2019 Diseases and Injuries Collaborators. Global burden of 369 Diseases and Injuries in 204 Countries and Territories, 1990-2019: a Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet (2020) 396(10258):1204–22. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30925-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14.GBD 2017 DALYs and HALE Collaborators. Global, Regional, and National Disability-Adjusted Life-Years (DALYs) for 359 Diseases and Injuries and Healthy Life Expectancy (HALE) for 195 Countries and Territories, 1990-2017: a Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet (2018) 392(10159):1859–922. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32335-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Reiner, RC, Olsen, HE, Ikeda, CT, Echko, MM, et al. Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors in Child and Adolescent Health, 1990 to 2017: Findings from the Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors 2017 Study. JAMA Pediatr (2019) 173(6):e190337. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.0337

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16.GBD 2017 Disease and Injury Incidence and Prevalence Collaborators. Global, Regional, and National Incidence, Prevalence, and Years Lived with Disability for 354 Diseases and Injuries for 195 Countries and Territories, 1990-2017: a Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet (2018) 392(10159):1789–858. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32279-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Liu, X, Yu, Y, Wang, M, Mubarik, S, Wang, F, Wang, Y, et al. The Mortality of Lung Cancer Attributable to Smoking Among Adults in China and the United States during 1990-2017. Cancer Commun (Lond) (2020) 40(11):611–9. doi:10.1002/cac2.12099

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Liu, Z, Jiang, Y, Yuan, H, Fang, Q, Cai, N, Suo, C, et al. The Trends in Incidence of Primary Liver Cancer Caused by Specific Etiologies: Results from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016 and Implications for Liver Cancer Prevention. J Hepatol (2019) 70(4):674–83. doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2018.12.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Xu, Y, Wang, A, Lin, X, Xu, J, Shan, Y, Pan, X, et al. Global burden and Gender Disparity of Vision Loss Associated with Diabetes Retinopathy. Acta Ophthalmol (2020) 99:431–40. doi:10.1111/aos.14644

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Wang, N, Mengersen, K, Tong, S, Kimlin, M, Zhou, M, and Hu, W. Global, Regional, and National burden of Lung Cancer and its Attributable Risk Factors, 1990 to 2017. Cancer (2020) 126(18):4220–34. doi:10.1002/cncr.33078

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Liu, Y, Wen, H, Bai, J, Shi, F, Bi, R, and Yu, C. Burden of Diabetes and Kidney Disease Attributable to Non-optimal Temperature from 1990 to 2019: A Systematic Analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Sci Total Environ (2022) 838(3):156495. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156495

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Farcomeni, A, and Geraci, M. Multistate Quantile Regression Models. Stats Med (2020) 39(3):45–56. doi:10.1002/sim.8393

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Bollyky, TJ, Templin, T, Cohen, M, and Dieleman, JL. Lower-Income Countries that Face the Most Rapid Shift in Noncommunicable Disease Burden Are Also the Least Prepared. Health Aff (Project Hope) (2017) 36(11):1866–75. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2017.0708

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Reidpath, DD, and Allotey, P. The burden Is Great and the Money Little: Changing Chronic Disease Management in Low- and Middle-Income Countries. J Glob Health (2012) 2(2):020301. doi:10.7189/jogh.02.020301

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Checkley, W, Ghannem, H, Irazola, V, Kimaiyo, S, Levitt, NS, Miranda, JJ, et al. Management of NCD in Low- and Middle-Income Countries. Glob Heart (2014) 9(4):431–43. doi:10.1016/j.gheart.2014.11.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26.Global Burden of Disease Health Financing Collaborator Network. Health Sector Spending and Spending on HIV/AIDS, Tuberculosis, and Malaria, and Development Assistance for Health: Progress towards Sustainable Development Goal 3. Lancet (2020) 396(10252):693–724. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30608-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27.Global Burden of Disease Health Financing Collaborator Network. Evolution and Patterns of Global Health Financing 1995-2014: Development Assistance for Health, and Government, Prepaid Private, and Out-Of-Pocket Health Spending in 184 Countries. Lancet (2017) 389(10083):1981–2004. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(17)30874-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28.Global Burden of Disease Health Financing Collaborator Network. Future and Potential Spending on Health 2015-40: Development Assistance for Health, and Government, Prepaid Private, and Out-Of-Pocket Health Spending in 184 Countries. Lancet (2017) 389(10083):2005–30. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(17)30873-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29.GBD 2019 Viewpoint Collaborators. Five Insights from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet (2020) 396(10258):1135–59. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31404-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Li, X, Cao, X, Guo, M, Xie, M, and Liu, X. Trends and Risk Factors of Mortality and Disability Adjusted Life Years for Chronic Respiratory Diseases from 1990 to 2017: Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. BMJ (2020) 368:m234. doi:10.1136/bmj.m234

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Thomas, H, Diamond, J, Vieco, A, Chaudhuri, S, Shinnar, E, Cromer, S, et al. Global Atlas of Cardiovascular Disease 2000-2016: The Path to Prevention and Control. Glob Heart (2018) 13(3):143–63. doi:10.1016/j.gheart.2018.09.511

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32.NCD Countdown 2030 collaborators. NCD Countdown 2030: Efficient Pathways and Strategic Investments to Accelerate Progress towards the Sustainable Development Goal Target 3.4 in Low-Income and Middle-Income Countries. Lancet (2022) 399(10331):1266–78. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02347-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33.National Center for Health S. Health, United States. Health, United States. With Special Feature on Prescription Drugs. Hyattsville (MD): National Center for Health Statistics US (2013).

Google Scholar

34. Palafox, B, McKee, M, Balabanova, D, AlHabib, KF, Avezum, AJ, Bahonar, A, et al. Wealth and Cardiovascular Health: a Cross-Sectional Study of Wealth-Related Inequalities in the Awareness, Treatment and Control of Hypertension in High-Middle- and Low-Income Countries. Int J Equity Health (2016) 15(1):199. doi:10.1186/s12939-016-0478-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Singh, GK, Siahpush, M, Azuine, RE, and Williams, SD. Increasing Area Deprivation and Socioeconomic Inequalities in Heart Disease, Stroke, and Cardiovascular Disease Mortality Among Working Age Populations, United States, 1969-2011. Int J MCH AIDS (2015) 3(2):119–33. doi:10.21106/ijma.45

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Roth, GA, Johnson, C, Abajobir, A, Abd-Allah, F, Abera, SF, Abyu, G, et al. Global, Regional, and National Burden of Cardiovascular Diseases for 10 Causes, 1990 to 2015. J Am Coll Cardiol (2017) 70(1):1–25. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2017.04.052

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Fitzmaurice, C, Abate, D, Abbasi, N, Abbastabar, H, Abd-Allah, F, Abdel-Rahman, O, et al. Global, Regional, and National Cancer Incidence, Mortality, Years of Life Lost, Years Lived with Disability, and Disability-Adjusted Life-Years for 29 Cancer Groups, 1990 to 2017: A Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. JAMA Oncol (2019) 5(12):1749–68. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.2996

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Fitzmaurice, C, Allen, C, Barber, RM, Barregard, L, Bhutta, ZA, Brenner, H, et al. Global, Regional, and National Cancer Incidence, Mortality, Years of Life Lost, Years Lived with Disability, and Disability-Adjusted Life-Years for 32 Cancer Groups, 1990 to 2015: A Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. JAMA Oncol (2017) 3(4):524–48. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.5688

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Siegel, RL, Miller, KD, and Jemal, A. Cancer Statistics. CA: a Cancer J clinicians (2019) 69(1):7–34. doi:10.3322/caac.21551

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Boscoe, FP, Johnson, CJ, Sherman, RL, Stinchcomb, DG, Lin, G, and Henry, KA. The Relationship between Area Poverty Rate and Site-specific Cancer Incidence in the United States. Cancer (2014) 120(14):2191–8. doi:10.1002/cncr.28632

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Carethers, JM, and Doubeni, CA. Causes of Socioeconomic Disparities in Colorectal Cancer and Intervention Framework and Strategies. Gastroenterology (2020) 158(2):354–67. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2019.10.029

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Lundqvist, A, Andersson, E, Ahlberg, I, Nilbert, M, and Gerdtham, U. Socioeconomic Inequalities in Breast Cancer Incidence and Mortality in Europe-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Eur J Public Health (2016) 26(5):804–13. doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckw070

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Plummer, M, de Martel, C, Vignat, J, Ferlay, J, Bray, F, and Franceschi, S. Global burden of Cancers Attributable to Infections in 2012: a Synthetic Analysis. Lancet Glob Health (2016) 4(9):e609–16. doi:10.1016/S2214-109X(16)30143-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Sahni, S, Talwar, A, Khanijo, S, and Talwar, A. Socioeconomic Status and its Relationship to Chronic Respiratory Disease. Adv Respir Med (2017) 85(2):97–108. doi:10.5603/ARM.2017.0016

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

45.GBD 2015 Tobacco Collaborators. Smoking Prevalence and Attributable Disease burden in 195 Countries and Territories, 1990-2015: a Systematic Analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet (2017) 389(10082):1885–906. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(17)30819-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Oberg, M, Jaakkola, MS, Woodward, A, Peruga, A, and Pruss-Ustun, A. Worldwide burden of Disease from Exposure to Second-Hand Smoke: a Retrospective Analysis of Data from 192 Countries. Lancet (2011) 377(9760):139–46. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61388-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

47.GBD 2015 Risk Factors Collaborators. Global, Regional, and National Comparative Risk Assessment of 79 Behavioural, Environmental and Occupational, and Metabolic Risks or Clusters of Risks, 1990-2015: a Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet (2016) 388(10053):1659–724. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(16)31679-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Alleyne, G, Binagwaho, A, Haines, A, Jahan, S, Nugent, R, Rojhani, A, et al. Embedding Non-communicable Diseases in the post-2015 Development Agenda. Lancet (2013) 381(9866):566–74. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(12)61806-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Osamor, PE, and Grady, C. Women's Autonomy in Health Care Decision-Making in Developing Countries: a Synthesis of the Literature. Int J women's Health (2016) 8:191–202. doi:10.2147/IJWH.S105483

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Temmerman, M, Khosla, R, Laski, L, Mathews, Z, and Say, L. Women's Health Priorities and Interventions. Bmj (2015) 351:h4147. doi:10.1136/bmj.h4147

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: cardiovascular diseases, Global Burden of Disease, neoplasms, chronic respiratory diseases, socio-demographic index

Citation: Bai J, Cui J, Shi F and Yu C (2023) Global Epidemiological Patterns in the Burden of Main Non-Communicable Diseases, 1990–2019: Relationships With Socio-Demographic Index. Int J Public Health 68:1605502. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2023.1605502

Received: 18 October 2022; Accepted: 03 January 2023;
Published: 16 January 2023.

Edited by:

Heresh Amini, University of Copenhagen, Denmark

Reviewed by:

Mansour Shamsipour, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Iran

Copyright © 2023 Bai, Cui, Shi and Yu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Chuanhua Yu, yuchua@whu.edu.cn

These authors have contributed equally to this work

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.